On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 8:17 PM Johnny Billquist wrote:
> As far as I can
> remember, the changes needed compared to a PDP-8 is not much. PC is at
> address 0 instead of internal to the CPU, and interrupts then store the
> PC at 1, and start executing at 2.
> All the rest of the CPU works the
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 7:54 PM Ray Jewhurst wrote:
>
> Has any ever thought of writing simulators for the two missing systems,
> the PDP-5 and the PDP-12?
>
Are you reacting to this recent post over on the PiDP-8/I list?
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/pidp-8/1Rdv-Syg9H4/_KSeiGkmEgAJ
If
I'm almost surprised that the PDP-5 isn't already done. As far as I can
remember, the changes needed compared to a PDP-8 is not much. PC is at
address 0 instead of internal to the CPU, and interrupts then store the
PC at 1, and start executing at 2.
All the rest of the CPU works the same, as
Greetings,
Has any ever thought of writing simulators for the two missing systems, the
PDP-5 and the PDP-12? I know there is documentation for both on Bitsavers
and software for the PDP-12 and I have seen some papertape labeled for both
use on the PDP-5 and PDP-8. If I had the knowledge I would
