Re: [Simh] The Missing PDP-8s

2019-08-14 Thread dott.piergiorgio
On 13/08/19 18:18, Bob Supnik wrote: ith Rich Cornwell's recent work, it's clear that the DECtape controllers should have been abstracted to a library ten years ago, but doing so would be a major PITA, now that there are six (at least) distinct implementations (PDP1, PDP18b, PDP11, PDP8 TC, PDP

Re: [Simh] The Missing PDP-8s

2019-08-13 Thread Bob Supnik
Well, no. It's a PDP-8/A as initially released and documented in the late 1976 PDP-8/A manuals and schematics. That machine was limited to 32KW. So was the initial, 1976 version of the FPP8-A. The KT8-A was released in mid 1978. It expanded memory capability to 128KW and added a number of othe

Re: [Simh] The Missing PDP-8s

2019-08-13 Thread Mattis Lind
> The reason there are two DECtape controllers in the current PDP-8 > simulator is that one is block-by-block (TC) and the other is line-by-line > (TD), where "line" is 3 bits! That means there is a device driver in > TD-aware PDP-8 software that has to assemble incoming data 3 bits at a time! > >

Re: [Simh] The Missing PDP-8s

2019-08-13 Thread Warren Young
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 10:18 AM Bob Supnik wrote: > As was pointed out, the existing PDP-8 CPU is basically a PDP-8/E or > -8/A. It's a mongrel. SIMH's FPP (floating point processor) peripheral emulates the version for the 8/a, but memory is limited to 32 kWords as in all models before the 8/a

Re: [Simh] The Missing PDP-8s

2019-08-13 Thread Paul Koning
> On Aug 13, 2019, at 12:25 PM, Richard Cornwell wrote: > > Hi Bob, > > >> ... >> I looked at a PDP-12 implementation. It's not hard, but I really >> didn't want to do Yet Another DECtape Simulator for Linctape. With >> Rich Cornwell's recent work, it's clear that the DECtape controllers >> s

Re: [Simh] The Missing PDP-8s

2019-08-13 Thread Richard Cornwell
Hi Bob, > As was pointed out, the existing PDP-8 CPU is basically a PDP-8/E or > -8/A. It doesn't have the model-specific capabilities of the current > PDP-11 CPU simulator. > > Making the PDP-8 "model specific" is a bit more difficult than just > putting in model tests at various points in t

Re: [Simh] The Missing PDP-8s

2019-08-13 Thread Bob Supnik
As was pointed out, the existing PDP-8 CPU is basically a PDP-8/E or -8/A. It doesn't have the model-specific capabilities of the current PDP-11 CPU simulator. Making the PDP-8 "model specific" is a bit more difficult than just putting in model tests at various points in the CPU. The periphera