Re: [Simh] VAX-11/782

2017-05-25 Thread Sergey Oboguev
Curiously enough, 11/782 and other MA780-based models were not the only multiprocessor design based on the 11/780. Some brave souls just took out the SBI terminator and hooked in a second KA780 CPU in its place, using the created dual-processor machine to develop what appears to be the very fir

Re: [Simh] VAX 11/782 simulation [was: :Re: Pdp8 terminals]

2016-09-07 Thread Al Kossow
On 9/7/16 3:19 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote: >> ...then there was the multiprocessor MV2, that had both local and shared >> memory... > > That was never a supported config from DEC, if I remember right? correct. Firefly, out of DEC SRC Firefox (vs3520/40) w CVAX cpus were sort of a productized

Re: [Simh] VAX 11/782 simulation [was: :Re: Pdp8 terminals]

2016-09-07 Thread Johnny Billquist
Hi. On 2016-09-07 21:57, Anders Magnusson wrote: Hm, IIRC the 83x0 was as asymetric as the 782...? It could also only take the interrupts at the master CPU. Uh. No, as far as I know/remember they 83x0 were not asymmetric in the way the 11/782 was. As far as I know, no other VAX did ASMP at a

Re: [Simh] VAX 11/782 simulation [was: :Re: Pdp8 terminals]

2016-09-07 Thread Jeremy Begg
Hi, VMS 5.0 introduced Symmetric MultiProcessing (SMP) and discontinued support for the 782. This would have been in the late 1980s by which time DEC had released "proper" multiprocessor VAX models. VMS still has the concept of a "primary CPU" and I think there are still some interrupt handler

Re: [Simh] VAX 11/782 simulation [was: :Re: Pdp8 terminals]

2016-09-07 Thread Anders Magnusson
Hm, IIRC the 83x0 was as asymetric as the 782...? It could also only take the interrupts at the master CPU. ...then there was the multiprocessor MV2, that had both local and shared memory... -- Ragge Den 2016-09-07 kl. 21:15, skrev Hittner, David T (IS): Wasn't the VAX 11/782 and the Asymm

[Simh] VAX 11/782 simulation [was: :Re: Pdp8 terminals]

2016-09-07 Thread Hittner, David T (IS)
Wasn't the VAX 11/782 and the Asymmetric model de-supported at some point during the life of VMS? I seem to remember hearing (at a DECUS Symposium?) that existing 11/782 customers would have to separate them into two 11/780's and then cluster them to upgrade to the latest version of VMS. Dave