On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 at 09:14, gérard Calliet
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Again I have some performance issues with simh.
>
> I built it on OpenVMS Itanium. It runs on a process with enought
> memory, it takes 1 of the 8 CPU Itanium with 100%, no page faults, and
> 100 BIO by second.
>
> On the emulated V
Hi,
We had a VAX Station 4000-90 128M Memory.
We have a RX28000 9520 8G Memory.
Gérard Calliet
Le 06/03/2019 à 10:57, Pontus Pihlgren a écrit :
Hi
I'm having trouble understanding your question. Are
you comparing CPU-time of a real VAX(which model?) to
emulated CPU-time on an Itanium machine
The reason was "you can do everything with 2 OpenVMS/Itanium boxes"
(they are Itanium I4)
Gérard Calliet
Le 06/03/2019 à 16:54, Zane Healy a écrit :
I have to wonder if a lightweight Linux disto, that has been locked down,
running on a Core i7 might not give better SIMH performance. My *old*
I have to wonder if a lightweight Linux disto, that has been locked down,
running on a Core i7 might not give better SIMH performance. My *old* i7 ESXI
box provides a faster “VAX” than my VAXstation 4000/60.
What is the reason for running on Itanium?
Zane
> On Mar 6, 2019, at 1:57 AM, Pontu
Hi
I'm having trouble understanding your question. Are
you comparing CPU-time of a real VAX(which model?) to
emulated CPU-time on an Itanium machine(which one?).
Emulation will have an associated overhead. If you
are compareing a fast VAX to an emulation on a slow
Itanium... well, Itanium is
Hello,
Again I have some performance issues with simh.
I built it on OpenVMS Itanium. It runs on a process with enought
memory, it takes 1 of the 8 CPU Itanium with 100%, no page faults, and
100 BIO by second.
On the emulated VAX we are running processes CPU intensive (old Ada
compiler), t
