> Hi Risto,
>
>
>
hi Dusan,
I think it will be beneficial to highlight this fact in Rule Types ->
> Suppress paragraph that other “techniques” have to be used to achieve
> suppression across multiple configuration files.
>
that's a good idea -- I will modify the documentation accordingly.
risto
Hi Risto,
I think it will be beneficial to highlight this fact in Rule Types -> Suppress
paragraph that other “techniques” have to be used to achieve suppression across
multiple configuration files.
I like idea to add this as separate FAQ entry.
Thank you,
Dusan
> Hi Risto,
>
> Thank you very much for your suggestions and explanation.
> Must agree with your arguments that introducing "continue" field option
> support into "Suppress" rule will introduce some confusions.
> I have never thought that this type of suppression logic can be achieved
> by "Jump"
Hi Risto,
Thank you very much for your suggestions and explanation.
Must agree with your arguments that introducing "continue" field option support
into "Suppress" rule will introduce some confusions.
I have never thought that this type of suppression logic can be achieved by
"Jump" rule.
