Re: [Simulavr-devel] patch: make bootstrap suggest a separate build directory

2009-06-16 Thread Onno Kortmann
Hi, I think more docs is good, but IMO it should be rather part of the 'configure --help' output. Consider that people may one day not check out from CVS but use a source .tar.gz instead. Greetings, Onno ___ Simulavr-devel mailing list

Re: [Simulavr-devel] patch: make bootstrap suggest a separate build directory

2009-06-16 Thread henne...@cableone.net
On Tue Jun 16 15:31 , Onno Kortmann sent: I think more docs is good, but IMO it should be rather part of the 'configure --help' output. Consider that people may one day not check out from CVS but use a source .tar.gz instead. I'm not trying to add more. I'm just trying to fix a bad doc.

Re: [Simulavr-devel] patch: make bootstrap suggest a separate build directory

2009-06-16 Thread henne...@cableone.net
On Tue Jun 16 16:54 , Onno Kortmann sent: output. Consider that people may one day not check out from CVS but use a source .tar.gz instead. I'm not trying to add more. I'm just trying to fix a bad doc. Well, maybe my bad english confuses you: I think that the bad (missing) docs are in

Re: [Simulavr-devel] patch: make bootstrap suggest a separate build directory

2009-06-16 Thread Onno Kortmann
Hi, People may download simulavrxx.tar.gz with a pre-made 'configure' from configure.ac, and they will not see your message when just calling 'configure'. Configure could use fixing also. I'm starting small. If it is in 'configure', it does not need to be in bootstrap, does it? In your