[Simulavr-devel] refactor.patch

2009-07-11 Thread henne...@cableone.net
Here is the promised refactoring of the atmega{48,88,18} code. Additionally, I reformatted some multi-wraparound lines. As before, the code passes the make check test. >From the output of cvs diff -c , I deleted most of the lines beginning with a question mark and duplicated the three "cannot find

Re: [Simulavr-devel] Which libbfd to use?

2009-07-11 Thread Joel Sherrill
ThomasK wrote: Hi, Onno told me, that there was a discussion about libbfd, an which to use on configure. (I havn't found this discussion in archive) The problem, which I had (Ubuntu 9.04 with package binutils and binutils-avr installed) is, that the include was used for compiling from binut

Re: [Simulavr-devel] atmega168

2009-07-11 Thread ThomasK
Hi Michael, Also, I have a pretty good idea how to fuel the factory, but that should be a separate patch. If you mean, how to set AVRFactory with the different AVRDevices, then take a look at Onno's repo. He has solved it by using a structure with a Constructor and a macro. So you have to d

[Simulavr-devel] Which libbfd to use?

2009-07-11 Thread ThomasK
Hi, Onno told me, that there was a discussion about libbfd, an which to use on configure. (I havn't found this discussion in archive) The problem, which I had (Ubuntu 9.04 with package binutils and binutils-avr installed) is, that the include was used for compiling from binutils-avr, which i