> -Original Message-
> From: henne...@cableone.net [mailto:henne...@cableone.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 12:57 AM
> To: simulavr-devel@nongnu.org; Onno Kortmann
> Cc: wedding...@csogate.cso.atmel.com; Weddington, Eric;
> henne...@cableone.net; 'Joerg Wunsch'
> Subject: R
On Tue Sep 29 14:47 , Onno Kortmann sent:
>Regarding the 'template stuff' (from your other post): I thought that it was
>giving the most abstract view and the most reduction in code size and I also
>have the opinion that in 2009, one ought to use templates if it makes sense.
>Compilers should
Hi again,
> >And yes, to backport this to CVS would be really a lot of work. It's
> >possible, but there are really much changes and the question is: take it
> >all without review and trust, that there are not really big bugs in it
> >or try to cherrypick the changes step by step?
>
> Trust, but ve
On Tue Sep 29 14:02 , Onno Kortmann sent:
>Hi,
>> > My concern isn't so much what VCS we use as what
>> > happens with the code in Onno's repository.
>As long as there is no consensus, I'll keep it on github.com. I clearly marked
>it as 'unofficial'.
My expectation is that at least some of the
Hi,
> > My concern isn't so much what VCS we use as what
> > happens with the code in Onno's repository.
As long as there is no consensus, I'll keep it on github.com. I clearly marked
it as 'unofficial'.
> Is Onno seeing these posts? Is on the CC list?
I am subscribed to the mailing list.
For t
On Tue Sep 29 0:44 , "Weddington, Eric" sent:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From:
>> simulavr-devel-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
>> [mailto:simulavr-devel-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongn
>> u.org] On Behalf Of Onno Kortmann
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 5
As Onno Kortmann wrote:
> I discussed the last developments with Thomas and I was using git
> specifically because some of you had problems with me having commit
> access.
Well, it would have made sense to fix the commit access problems
then...
> That said, and to answer the question about git's
