Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started

2010-03-20 Thread Joerg Wunsch
As Joerg Wunsch wrote: > Update: as Thomas Klepp was the only one from the "new developers > team" who already registered as a developer, I simply granted him the > admin bit, so he's your new admin in charge now. Complain to him for > anything that doesn't work. :-) (You've already got my offer

Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started

2010-03-20 Thread Joerg Wunsch
As Weddington, Eric wrote: > IIRC, Jennifer was working for Joel, so we could remove her from the > project. Done. I also removed the pending request of Colin Coombs, as nobody appears to know him, so it's not quite clear what his intentions are. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ..

Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started

2010-03-20 Thread Joerg Wunsch
As Weddington, Eric wrote: > This is what I was talking about: Your comment above suggests that I > "try out git and load [your] repo". Well, Eric, don't misunderstand him here: that's simply because they continued development *only* within that Git repo, so you can only see it there -- which in

RE: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started

2010-03-20 Thread Weddington, Eric
> -Original Message- > From: Onno Kortmann [mailto:o...@gmx.net] > Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 5:28 PM > To: Weddington, Eric > Cc: simulavr-devel@nongnu.org > Subject: Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started > > 3. I feel a bit (but just a bit offended :-) by your above > comme

RE: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started

2010-03-20 Thread Weddington, Eric
> -Original Message- > From: > simulavr-devel-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org > [mailto:simulavr-devel-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongn > u.org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch > Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2010 12:50 AM > To: simulavr-devel@nongnu.org > Subject: Re: [Simul

Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started

2010-03-20 Thread Joerg Wunsch
As Onno Kortmann wrote: > 3. I feel a bit (but just a bit offended :-) by your above comment > about using a VCS more than doing development. At some point in the past, one could really get that impression when following the mailing-list. However, I agree, this changed recently, as actual techni

Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started

2010-03-20 Thread Joerg Wunsch
As Onno Kortmann wrote: > 1. who knows that the 'I want devel-access' knob on savannah will > trigger more of a response than a well-though-out patch on the ML or > savannahs tracker will do? As I already told you before: committing a well-thought-out patch from the patch tracker would require a

Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started

2010-03-20 Thread Joerg Wunsch
As Petr HluzĂ­n wrote: > > I'm an administrator here, yes, but that doesn't mean I would be > > patching a CVS tree that is not even used by the developers at > > all. > Well, someone has to. That's what I said: you always expected a mythical "someone" to do "something". I've already epxlained i