Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started

2010-03-21 Thread Joerg Wunsch
As Onno Kortmann wrote: > - both Thomas and I get the permission to freely change and develop > on HEAD. This may include big and incomplete changes. Things will > break. Btw., that nevertheless doesn't mean you should attempt to discuss large-scale changes on the mailing list first, and if someo

Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started

2010-03-21 Thread Joerg Wunsch
As Onno Kortmann wrote: > - I get developer access Just go to the savannah site, and hit the "join this group" button, or, as Eric wrote, tell us your developer name. > - Petr may want access, too(?) He already got. > - Our patched simulavrxx will become the developer version of > simulavr, an

RE: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started

2010-03-21 Thread Weddington, Eric
Sounds like a good plan to me. I appreciate the fact that you're dropping the -xx suffix, and that you're offering help with using git. You need to let us know your Savannah username so we can put you on the project. Eric > -Original Message- > From: > simulavr-devel-bounces+eric.wed

Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started

2010-03-21 Thread Onno Kortmann
Hi all, Ok. I think there is a a way now that we could merge and abandon the fork. Let us book the knob/no-knob and similar discussions under misunderstandings (thats mostly my impression now, btw) and move on. I now propose the following hopefully very clearly: - I get developer access - P

Fwd: Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started

2010-03-21 Thread henne...@cableone.net
On Sat Mar 20 9:21 , Joerg Wunsch j...@uriah.heep.sax.de> sent: >Oh, and one more offer to renew: > >I notice that moving to Git doesn't appear to be that 100 % agreed >among the currently active developers as I initially believed. So in >case you decide to rather use SVN, and want me to migrate