Re: [Simulavr-devel] ATMega8 class definition

2010-10-17 Thread Petr Hluzín
Hi Thomas On 17 October 2010 19:09, Thomas Klepp wrote: > Hi Ivica, > >> I think the atmega16_32 interrupt vectors for EEPROM Ready are not > > Not only this interrupt, also some other around ... My mistake, I've > compared mostly register set but not interrupt vector table too. By looking at th

Re: [Simulavr-devel] ATMega8 class definition

2010-10-17 Thread Petr Hluzín
Hello On 15 October 2010 21:30, Petr Hluzín wrote: > I will commit the fix and review your new files tomorrow (in Europe), > unless an other commiter is faster. Fix committed [1]. I think there were some problems [2], verify if my fix is correct. The Atmega8 code leaves some registers as not im

Re: [Simulavr-devel] ATMega8 class definition

2010-10-17 Thread Thomas Klepp
Hi Ivica, I think the atmega16_32 interrupt vectors for EEPROM Ready are not Not only this interrupt, also some other around ... My mistake, I've compared mostly register set but not interrupt vector table too. I had only time for a short look now, but your posting is a hint to compare eve