RE: [Simulavr-devel] simulavrxx - state of affairs

2009-01-31 Thread William Rivet
ssage- > > From: > > simulavr-devel-bounces+eweddington=cso.atmel@nongnu.org > > [mailto:simulavr-devel-bounces+eweddington=cso.atmel@nongn > > u.org] On Behalf Of William Rivet > > Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 5:25 PM > > To: Onno Kortmann >

Re: [Simulavr-devel] simulavrxx - state of affairs

2009-01-31 Thread William Rivet
Klaus is the only one who make significant commits, I'm just keeping the lights on for reasons I won't go into. We could use someone to take up this project, if anyone is willing. I'd be happy to have new committers or even someone to take over if that makes sense. What you are noticing is that

Re: [Simulavr-devel] simulavrxx timers

2008-06-01 Thread William Rivet
I think Klaus and I crossed wires here...sorry guys. I thought he explicitly didn't want it in CVS...but I see now he just meant for me to turn the crank on it to be sure it cycled here as well as on his machine before commiting to CVS... Klaus, unless you correct me, I'll try to get this commit

RE: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavr error

2008-04-21 Thread William Rivet
Ok, please let this topic ride for a few more weeks...I have not yet tried to build/debug on cygwin nor on MSVC or like. (I think I have MSVC still) I have had actual time to work on simulavrxx in the last few weeks, and I'm getting several hours more to tinker in the next few as well. There was

Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavr error

2008-04-16 Thread William Rivet
; the majority vote :-) > >> > >> > > Lets finish all the discussions... what is actually > > required from the "outside world"? > > A reliable familiar way to build simulavrxx. :-) > > e.g. > 1) unpack (eg tar xzf) > 2) configure

RE: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavr error

2008-04-13 Thread William Rivet
Right, sorry if I gave the wrong impression ;-) On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 18:14 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote: > On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, William Rivet wrote: > > > If there is interest in simulavrxx, pipe up. I tend to spend time on > > this when I get people asking qu

RE: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavr error

2008-04-11 Thread William Rivet
Thanks Eric. I'll just pipe in that I'm currently working on replacing the build system for simulavrxx with something more sane via CMake...thanks to a little nudging by Michael Buesch :-) I'm focused on getting what was working all working under CMake, reviving the test cases, and yes then I'll

Re: [Simulavr-devel] RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: simulavrxx build problems

2008-03-13 Thread William Rivet
I'll get back to you on this shortly..I'm at pycon right now as it turns out ;-) wireless is spotty though, so not sure how much I can get done from here :-( On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 08:46 +0100, Klaus Rudolph wrote: > Michael Hennebry schrieb: > > > Compiling with -g helped. > > How do I make the

Re: [Simulavr-devel] More trouble with new auto* infrastructure

2008-01-21 Thread William Rivet
I went by what I got on my system. Not "right" I know. I still want to check that it looks like a libbfd was found that might work... Ok, my proposed correction: 1.) I'll make a change to allow the path to the library to be given and used wherever it is. Then to locate the include file I'll just

RE: [Simulavr-devel] structural change of source code

2008-01-20 Thread William Rivet
:-) I do understand Knut. I'll have to reveiw these things later. I can say that I am probably mistaken, but at the time I thought I needed to build the shared libraries differently for different language bindings... I'd rather help you get your projects up and running (and documentation writte

Re: [Simulavr-devel] sample build...

2008-01-13 Thread William Rivet
rsions are you using? I'm not well versed in the autotools, so I don't have an idea for you yet. I'll look into it though... On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 22:44 -0600, Michael Hennebry wrote: > On Sat, 12 Jan 2008, William Rivet wrote: > > > I saw the attachments :-) > >

Re: [Simulavr-devel] sample build...

2008-01-12 Thread William Rivet
r is strange however...It looks like you don't have "Makefile.in" files. Could you confirm you indeed have a Makefile.in in your simulavrxx and src directories? Cheers, Bill On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 20:27 -0600, Michael Hennebry wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, William Rivet w

[Simulavr-devel] Re: Simulator for GCC Testing [was: RE: [Fwd: Re: [avr-gcc-list] GCC-AVR Register optimisations]]

2008-01-11 Thread William Rivet
Eric, please share what info you have with me. I wouldn't mind running whatever works through simulavr to see what it is about (I'm new to the regression suite...I've only hacked GCC for it's C++ front-end bits, and certainly broke many things when I did :-p ) Give the recent interest I'm trying t

[Simulavr-devel] sample build...

2008-01-08 Thread William Rivet
cvs -z3 -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sources/simulavr co simulavrxx then in simulavrxx do: ./bootstrap ./configure --enable-python make now in examples/anacomp, with avr-gcc in your path, try: make do_python This will start up an iTCL GUI, simulavr and DDD ready to debug the anacomp demo. At

[Simulavr-devel] CVS commits

2008-01-08 Thread William Rivet
Since there is interest in simulavr at the moment, I have checked in my changes. This effectively removes TCL support. This is only temporary. It still requires tcl for the examples gui even when makint go_python in examples/anacomp. o.O The python supoprt is disabled by default. Use --enable-py

Re: [Simulavr-devel] Re: Missing -fPIC when compiling code for .so files?

2008-01-08 Thread William Rivet
Woot! Michael and Joerg, I have reworked the autotools bits, but probably still have that messed up. Last night I began setting up my development area again for this. I really could use the second (and third) set of eyes you guys have for this, since I'm sure I am doing things the hard/wrong way.

[Simulavr-devel] bump

2007-08-20 Thread William Rivet
Hi all...I know some of you are monitoring and occasionally emailing. I just wanted to put on the list that the build scripts are being rewritten. They will be released with a new tarball when the simulator builds on my own GNU/Linux box and under my Cygwin environment. Hopefully this time aroun

RE: [Simulavr-devel] Is this project still alive?

2007-08-07 Thread William Rivet
I think the reluctance here is that we want to be sure we are pulling in the same direction. I'm not opposed to adding contributors, but I would like to set some goals and ensure we work toward them. Through various exchanges I think we have the following modest goals: 1.) Simulavrxx must be a

Re: [Simulavr-devel] Is this project still alive?

2007-08-05 Thread William Rivet
he-he-he-he-. Beavis... ...he said a**! he-he-he-he-he-he- ;-) no problem, I call that fat-finger syndrome ;-^ On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 09:22 -0500, John Hasler wrote: > I wrote: > > When you ass features... >^^^ >add > ___

Re: [Simulavr-devel] Is this project still alive?

2007-08-01 Thread William Rivet
Thanks Klaus. I was wondering if you would pipe in here ;-) I am reworking the build scripts now. It is the first thing I need done so that I can put in features I'll (hopefully) be needing soon. Cheers, Bill On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 19:37 +0200, Klaus Rudolph wrote: > The project members are s

RE: [Simulavr-devel] Is this project still alive?

2007-08-01 Thread William Rivet
I stand corrected! I see the patches now, assigned to Klaus. Thanks for the ping Eric. On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 06:07 -0600, Eric Weddington wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > u.org] On

Re: [Simulavr-devel] Re: Build Failure

2007-07-31 Thread William Rivet
Thanks for the heads up. I might have made a link to from Python.h to the specific Python2.5/Python.h etc, but if it works for you as a workaround today, then thanks for sharing. I'll check this issue as I work out the configure script changes I have in progress. On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 13:13 -0

Re: [Simulavr-devel] Is this project still alive?

2007-07-31 Thread William Rivet
Valid point to be sure. Ping this list or the patch topic to let me know what is of interest and what is not. I see a patch, but it doesn't look like yours. On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 17:23 -0400, Michael N. Moran wrote: > John Hasler wrote: > > Is this project alive? > > I've got patches dating f

Re: [Simulavr-devel] Is this project still alive?

2007-07-31 Thread William Rivet
It is on life support I would say. John, you have run into problems that are known and my fixes are only paritally implemented. (2 of my last 3 weeks have been vacation...hence the silence this weekend) Eric has asked to join the team. John, if you have ideas on documentation, that would be a gr