On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 7:48 AM, Thomas McCabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:16 AM, Samantha Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thomas McCabe wrote:
>
> > Popularity is irrelevant.
>
> Popularity, of course, is not the ultimate judge of accuracy. But are
> you seriousl
Thomas,
The argument I presented is *not* a restatement of Rice's theorem,
because the concept of the size of a scientific theory is not something
that maps onto the parallel concept of the size of a functions,
algorithm or program.
In order to map theory-size onto algorithm-size it would b
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:16 AM, Samantha Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thomas McCabe wrote:
>
> >
> > Does NASA have a coherent response to the moon hoax theory?
> >
> This is completely uncalled for. No particular theory of AGI at this time
> disserves to be compared to the moon hoax cons
