Re: [Sip-implementors] Doubt about CSeq number....

2005-10-28 Thread Dale R. Worley
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 14:10 +0530, Nataraju A B wrote: > I have a simple doubt about CSeq number in an out-going message > > Is it ok to have the same CSeq number for a REGISTER request and > SUBSCRIBE request.. As others have said, the answer to this is yes. But that assumes that the REGI

RE: [Sip-implementors] Doubt about CSeq number....

2005-10-28 Thread Prashant.Prabhu
uot; can not be used. Regards, Prashant -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Manjunath Vasudeva (IFIN CSW WL) Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 3:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] Dou

Re: RE: [Sip-implementors] Doubt about CSeq number....

2005-10-28 Thread gupta gaurav
gt;sequence number, the request is in order. > > If it would be valid, then RFC would have clearly > mention that the request with same sequence number > MUST/SHOULD be accepted. > > Regards, > Manju > > - Original Message - > From: Michael Procter <[EMAIL

RE: [Sip-implementors] Doubt about CSeq number....

2005-10-28 Thread Vasudeva.Manjunath
Subject: [Sip-implementors] Doubt about CSeq number Hi Alll, I have a simple doubt about CSeq number in an out-going message Is it ok to have the same CSeq number for a REGISTER request and SUBSCRIBE request.. e.g., REGISTER request ... CSeq: 1 REGISTER

RE: RE: [Sip-implementors] Doubt about CSeq number....

2005-10-28 Thread Michael Procter
> Hi All, >I think the same CSeq no. is contradictory. Even in the > UAS behaviour, the handling for the same CSeq is not defined. > In section 12.2.2 under UAS behaviour it is described as > > RFC 3261: Section12.2.2 UAS Behaviour: >If the remote sequence number was not empty, but the

Re: RE: [Sip-implementors] Doubt about CSeq number....

2005-10-28 Thread ManjunathSWarad 70905
: [Sip-implementors] Doubt about CSeq number > > > Hi Alll, > > > > I have a simple doubt about CSeq number in an out-going message > > > > Is it ok to have the same CSeq number for a REGISTER request and > > SUBSCRIBE request.. > > Yes. >

Re: [Sip-implementors] Doubt about CSeq number....

2005-10-28 Thread Somesh S Shanbhag
Hi Nataraju, Yes, I think it's valid. Regards, Somesh S. Shanbhag --- Nataraju A B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Alll, > > I have a simple doubt about CSeq number in an > out-going message > > Is it ok to have the same CSeq number for a REGISTER > request and > SUBSCRIBE request.. >

RE: [Sip-implementors] Doubt about CSeq number....

2005-10-28 Thread Michael Procter
> Hi Alll, > > I have a simple doubt about CSeq number in an out-going message > > Is it ok to have the same CSeq number for a REGISTER request and > SUBSCRIBE request.. Yes. > It's been mentioned in 8.1.3.5 that CSeq number must be increased upon > failure to earlier request.. This do

[Sip-implementors] Doubt about CSeq number....

2005-10-28 Thread Nataraju A B
Hi Alll, I have a simple doubt about CSeq number in an out-going message Is it ok to have the same CSeq number for a REGISTER request and SUBSCRIBE request.. e.g., REGISTER request ... CSeq: 1 REGISTER ... ... SUBSCRIBE request. ... CSeq: 1