Re: [Sip-implementors] relationship between contact URI in REGISTER andrequest uri in INVITE

2007-07-23 Thread Marco Ambu
Stephan Steiner ha scritto: Actually this proxy/registrar (the Linksys SPA9000), does things in a rather interesting way: Here's how the UA registers: REGISTER sip:192.168.1.4:6060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.143:1027;branch=z9hG4bK-15jt0sfyr8xy;rport From: Stephan Snom sip:[EMAIL

[Sip-implementors] ACK - separate transaction

2007-07-23 Thread Hema R
Hi, What is the reason for including ACK in an INVITE transaction for a non-2xx response and making it a separate transaction for a 2xx response? Is there any specific reason from the design perspective? Thanks, Hema.

Re: [Sip-implementors] ACK - separate transaction

2007-07-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An error response to an INVITE terminates a transaction. The error MAY occur before the INVITE reaches the actual destination. Example is a 404 generated by a proxy because it cannot route the INVITE to an actual UA. A 200 Ok for an INVITE, however, can only be generated by the