Hi all,
Scenario is below,
UAC is sending an INVITE with Content-Disposition Header with value
session and handling parameter 'optional' and with Content-language
header also.
At UAS, if the language specified in Content-language is not supported
and also handling parameter of Content-Dispositio
I'm using X-Lite version 3.0 and it seems to "play" RFC 4733 DTMF tones
just fine.
In order to get a second option, you may want to examine the packets
using wireshark or ethereal and see if it identifies the packets your
server sends as being RFC 2833/4733 DTMF event packets.
Cheers,
Charles
> -
To answer your last question - it can certainly make sense in some
cases. An example is a fault tolerant UA with multiple instances.
In any case it is not the business of the registrar to decide if it
makes sense - the UA gets to decide what sort of contact it wants to
use. The registrar is exp
I agree with Scott.
Since the contacts are pre-configured on the registrar, when the key
telephone system comes up, use whatever mechanism fits you to kind of
enable those pre-configured routes on the registrar. It could be the
telephone system creating a tcp connection to the registrar, that is
t
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 10:43 -0500, Raj Jain wrote:
> On Jan 9, 2008 9:31 AM, Paul Kyzivat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If its fully distributed with no central point of control, then
> > presumably the individual line cards (UAs) become available/unavailable
> > independently. That seems inco
I misspoke when I said an FQDN can have multiple A records in the DNS.
I meant to use the term "domain name" not FQDN.
--
Raj
On Jan 9, 2008 10:43 AM, Raj Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 9, 2008 9:31 AM, Paul Kyzivat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If its fully distributed with no cent
On Jan 9, 2008 9:31 AM, Paul Kyzivat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If its fully distributed with no central point of control, then
> presumably the individual line cards (UAs) become available/unavailable
> independently. That seems inconsistent with the desire to have a single
> registration enabl
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 01:47 -0800, Jitendra Singh Bhadoriya wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Is it possible and logical to send both Authorization and
> Proxy-Authorization headers in the same request(say INVITE).
Yes - perfectly reasonable.
> Also is it possible to receive a 401 Unauthorized respons
Raj Jain wrote:
>> Then I am very confused. Why are hundreds of contacts bound to a single
>> AOR? When a caller addresses a call to the AOR, can it really be
>> answered by any of hundreds of devices? The only situation I am aware of
>> that fits that description is a call center. But it doesn't
> Then I am very confused. Why are hundreds of contacts bound to a single
> AOR? When a caller addresses a call to the AOR, can it really be
> answered by any of hundreds of devices? The only situation I am aware of
> that fits that description is a call center. But it doesn't sound like
> that is
Raj Jain wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Reading between the lines, this sounds like the goal is for a
>> "pbx" to register with a proxy, and then for the proxy to
>> route calls for a block of numbers to that pbx.
>
> You're close. It's a key telephone system.
>
>> The sip forum addres
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 12:16 AM
Subject: Sip-implementors Digest, Vol 58, Issue 6
> Send Sip-implementors mailing list submissions to
> sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wid
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 3:43 AM
Subject: Sip-implementors Digest, Vol 58, Issue 7
> Send Sip-implementors mailing list submissions to
> sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 6:28 AM
Subject: Sip-implementors Digest, Vol 58, Issue 8
> Send Sip-implementors mailing list submissions to
> sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide
Hi All,
Can u plz answer me what is the Difference between,
Early Media,Late Media and Early Dialog and Late Dialog.
Santosh
On 1/8/08, Brett Tate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There are numerous tools and clients such as SIPp
> (http://sipp.sourceforge.net/) and X-Lite
> (http://www.coun
15 matches
Mail list logo
