Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on B2BUA inserting methods in Allow header

2008-09-19 Thread Jagan Mohan
I was just thinking of an alternative soln. for this issue. How about sending a 500 Error response with Retry-After header, so that UAC could try re-sending the UPDATE request after a time decided by Retry-After header value? Then we could probably expect the call to connect, in the meantime, afte

Re: [Sip-implementors] draft-worley-service-example-02

2008-09-19 Thread Roman Shpount
Dale, How would you deal with re-Invite collisions between MOH server and the UA that you placed on hold? The normal re-Invite back-off will not work properly if it was your UA that established the call to the held UA (otherwise you can just use Retry-After header). You probably need a section or

Re: [Sip-implementors] Broadsoft FAX problem

2008-09-19 Thread Schwarz Albrecht
1) SIP/SDP call establishment procedures for T.38 are specified in Annex D/T.38 (2005/09). This is normativ for T.38 implementations. 2) The term (G.711) pass-through mode is misleading, because there is a a) G.711 audio mode and b) G.711 VBD mode (see ITU-T V.152; G.711 used as VBD codec) SDP fo

Re: [Sip-implementors] Broadsoft FAX problem

2008-09-19 Thread Jean-Francois Mule
Hi, The best option is to contact Broadsoft. I do not know the implementation of fax support in Broadsoft's products but typically, you start a fax call using a vo-coder (G.711 in your case) and then some implementations *may* switch to fax relay using T.38. Some implementations do not support

Re: [Sip-implementors] Broadsoft FAX problem

2008-09-19 Thread Somesh S. Shanbhag
Rohit, You may be right, may be driven by configuration or may be because the client didn't indicate the T38 capability its switching automatically to G711 Mode. Somesh S Shanbhag M G L Bangalore -Original Message- From: Rohit Aggarwal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 9/19/2008 2:5

Re: [Sip-implementors] Broadsoft FAX problem

2008-09-19 Thread Rohit Aggarwal
Hi If I understand it correctly, Somesh is suggesting addition of T38 media stream in offer from the endpoint whereas Neranza's query is how to make Broadsoft initiate T.38 fax instead of Pass-Through on tone detection? I think Neranza wants that Broadsoft should add T38 stream in the Re-INVITE

Re: [Sip-implementors] Broadsoft FAX problem

2008-09-19 Thread Somesh S. Shanbhag
I think you will have to put something like this in SDP m=image 1 udptl t38 a=T38FaxVersion:0 a=T38MaxBitRate:14400 a=T38FaxFillBitRemoval:0 a=T38FaxTranscodingMMR:0 a=T38FaxTranscodingJBIG:0 a=T38FaxRateManagement:transferredTCF a=T38FaxMaxBuffer:200 a=T38FaxMaxDatagram:300 a=T38FaxUdpEC:t38U

[Sip-implementors] Broadsoft FAX problem

2008-09-19 Thread Neranza Bundova
Hello All, I have a problem with sending a T38 FAX over a Broadsoft server. I am sending to a PSTN FAX so the Broadsoft server is terminating SIP point and it should send me REINVITE for T38 but it does not. It is just accepting the FAX transmission over G711. My question is there some specif