you have any request with an old CSeq.
and then tell the vendor of the illegally-behaving UA to fix their
product.
Regards,
Attila
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Vicky
Sent: 10 November 2008 08:36
To:
Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2008/11/10 Paul Kyzivat [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
Hi, draft-anil-sipping-bla requires a 3rd Party Registration. This
REGISTER is a normal REGISTER but From and To are different, there is no
more special data into the request.
Are there other
Hi,
You can generate 500 Internal Server Error for BYE request.
Regds
Somesh S Shanbhag
M G L Bangalore
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Vicky
Sent: Mon 11/10/2008 2:06 PM
To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [Sip-implementors] Same CSeq value in
2008/11/10 Paul Kyzivat [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Oh, sorry. I haven't been paying much attention to BLA. I didn't realize it
covered this case. (I was thinking it only covered multiple extensions
with same identity. But now that I look I see it does cover the
boss/secretary case as well.
I've read
The core of the draft are exactly the RFC's you mention below. The only
addition IMO is the notion of line appearance selection and extensions to
dialog state payload to reflect the same. I am not sure I understand what
aspects of the draft you find complex? It would definitely help if you can
Hello All,
I am in the process of implementing Bridged line appearance with Subscribe/
Notify mechanism and have some doubts on error cases for subscribe / Notify
other than 481 which clearly gives a hint call leg does not exist.
My doubts are
How a server would handle if a 408 / 5xx response
Hi,
What is UAS supposed to do if the CSeq number for the subsequent in a
dialog request is equal to previous CSeq?
As in RFC 3261 section 12.2.2 only talks about less than or greater than values.
UA UA
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -
Hello Suresh,
RFC 5057 will help you understand dialog creation and termination in a
better way. Go through table on page 9.
But I will suggest you to read the complete RFC before making any decision.
Regards,
Sumit Jindal
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Comments Inline with [SSS]
Somesh S Shanbhag
M G L Bangalore
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Suresh Arunachalam
Sent: Mon 11/10/2008 5:03 PM
To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [Sip-implementors] Bridged Line Appearance.
Hello All,
I am in the
Hi All,
Could you please explain the role of an SBC in the IMS domain ? Is it the
P-CSCF function ???
Manoj
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
2008/11/10 Paul Kyzivat [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
Hi, draft-anil-sipping-bla requires a 3rd Party Registration. This
REGISTER is a normal REGISTER but From and To are different, there is no
more special data into the request.
Are there other cases in which 3rd Party
you have any request with an old CSeq.
sorry, that should've been you can ignore any request with an old CSeq.
Somesh's idea about 500 is probably ok too.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Attila Sipos
Sent: 10 November 2008 08:42
To:
From: Vicky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is UAS supposed to do if the CSeq number for the subsequent in a
dialog request is equal to previous CSeq?
As in RFC 3261 section 12.2.2 only talks about less than or greater than
values.
The difficulty is that if the UAC is functioning correctly,
13 matches
Mail list logo
