I think 415 is too specific, there's no limitation in RFC3261 that 400
is only applicable to msg headers.
Regards,
-Rockson
-Original Message-
From: Avasarala Ranjit-A20990 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 3:03 PM
To: Rockson Li (zhengyli); Tarun2 Gupta; Maxim So
Hi
When you are sure SDP is malformed, then won't 415 Unsupported media is
better? 400 would be better if any of the headers of INVITE are wrong.
Regards
Ranjit
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rockson Li (zhengyli)
Sent: Monday, Decemb
I agree with Tarun here
Rockson
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Tarun2 Gupta
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 11:39 AM
To: Maxim Sobolev; sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Proper negative final status c
Hi All,
I am writing small application which sends a REGISTER message to a registrar
and in turn receives a 200 OK. My application reads all the details for the
REGISTER message from an XML file and uses UDP sockets to send the data to
registrar. As of now, I have developed the reading from XML fi
Hi
IMO, 400 is the most apt response code.
Regards,
Tarun Gupta
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Maxim Sobolev
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2008 11:12 AM
To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [Sip-implementors]
> <>
> The contacts A1 & A2 from the UA's perspective are just different ways
> to get a call delivered to it. UA does not intend to prioritize one over
> the other. What would be the need for the server in this case to return
> different expires. While I understand that theoretically it is possibl
Inline a couple of clarifications
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2008 10:10 PM
To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on RFC 3680.
From: "P Sudarsh
Dear all,
I have a question regarding per-did billing in a IP-PBX, and the scenario is
this.
An IP-PBX has 3 DIDs assigned from a Service Providers and two companies
are sharing the IP-PBX for cost saving; assigning 2 DIDs for 'A' compa
From: Maxim Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Yes, this is my best pick at the moment, however, I am little bit unsure
as SDP syntax is not part of SIP RFC.
Since there doesn't appear to be any more specific response, 400
appears to be the only choice.
Dale
_
From: "P Sudarshanakrishnan-A14377" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Assuming A registers contacts A1, A2. When a network entity initiates a
notification I am not sure if there is a possibility that it indicates
different attributes (say rejected for A1 and probation for A2) for the
individual c
10 matches
Mail list logo
