My 2 cents
First sending multiple 180 with the same tags is completely valid.
Second, IMO a 183 would be a good answer for this. the only thing to be
careful here is if whether the voice has been cut already or not by MGW.
if it has not, then 183 wo/SDP should be good enough
if the voice has bee
El Martes, 12 de Mayo de 2009, Vikram Chhibber escribió:
> This information can be carried in PIDF by means of XCAP or SIP protocol.
> Information that is more of a characteristics of a person as per RFC
> 4479, large in size and does not change with time is most likely to be
> updated and distribu
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 14:25 +0530, Kapil Saxena wrote:
> I have a MGW that has SIP interface towards UE and ISUP towards MSC.
>
> For a SIP->ISUP call:
>
> 1. MGW receives SIP INVITE from UE and sends IAM to MSC-A.
> 2. MGW receives backward ACM message with "called party status =
> free" fro
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 08:47 +0200, Damir Reic wrote:
> If UAS receives BYE on early dialog and answers it with 200OK, does it have
> to respond to initial invite with 487 (same as CANCEL was received)?
In RFC 3261 section 15.1.2, it says:
The UAS MUST still respond to any pending requests rece
I agree with maxim. This is not the forum for these questions.
You can check this in the product data sheet.
http://www.mirial.com/pdf/Datasheet/MirialSoftphone_Datasheet.pdf
Under Section "RFC Compliancy", support for INFO is mentioned
Regards
Harsha
-Original Message-
From: sip-implem
I have a MGW that has SIP interface towards UE and ISUP towards MSC.
For a SIP->ISUP call:
1. MGW receives SIP INVITE from UE and sends IAM to MSC-A.
2. MGW receives backward ACM message with "called party status = free" from
MSC-A.
3. MGW sends 180 Ringing towards SIP UE.
4. Called Part
I am so very sorry for this. Will not repeat it.
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Harsha Ramanagoudra <
harsha_ramanagou...@infosys.com> wrote:
> I agree with maxim. This is not the forum for these questions.
>
> You can check this in the product data sheet.
> http://www.mirial.com/pdf/Datasheet/
Hi!
I want to know if any one implemented TMMBR flow control support (RFC
5104) ? Any clients available with this support ?
How do you calculate over-head value(if RTP is considered as reference
protocol layer, then can we use 40 bytes by default )?
--
-Ashwin.
_
Damir Reic wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> another question...
> If UAS receives BYE on early dialog and answers it with 200OK, does it have
> to respond to initial invite with 487 (same as CANCEL was received)?
Yes. INVITE and CANCEL or BYE transactions complete independently.
Regards,
--
Maksym Sobolyev
Of course.
A mail from the old days but still very valid:
http://www.mail-archive.com/sip-implement...@cs.columbia.edu/msg01270.ht
ml
Best regards,
Ben.
> -Original Message-
> From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> [mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu]
sarvpriya wrote:
> HI,
> Can you please tell does MIRIAL support sending of INFO message? If yes then
> how?
It's wrong place to ask. You should have submitted question like this to
the vendor of a particular software.
Regards,
--
Maksym Sobolyev
Sippy Software, Inc.
Internet Telephony (VoIP) E
11 matches
Mail list logo
