However, if the receiving client has the full knowledge of the network,
nothing prevents it from implementing policies like "accept only from
certain IP address" etc for better security.
Regards
Satya T
-Original Message-
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
[mailto:sip-i
Vivek,
The IP address published is for listening only. Sending may or may not
happen from the same address depending on sender's signaling/media
architecture and type of NAT.
>> Actually what happens in absence of this restriction, my SIP client
start mixing the RTP packets received
>> from any I
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 16:01 +0530, hanifa.mohammed wrote:
> On receiving 407 for the intiail INvITE request, should the Route-set
> be updated in the caller side?
No: Because the request failed, it has no effect on the dialog state.
In addition, since the initial request failed, it does not creat
Vivek --
You're talking about symmetrical RTP. There's no fundamental
requirement for RTP to go to and from the same set of IPs; there could
be four different IP addresses involved in a single ordinary two-way
media session, and that's perfectly valid.
However, in practice, many devices DO
Hi list,
Just a small query!
During SIP signaling, when SDP offer/ answer completes, calling SIP device
starts sending RTP to the IP:Port recieved in SDP answer from called party.
Calling SIP device opens its UDP port (for RTP) sent in the SDP offer.
Now, should calling SIP device listens for
Hi
The wlsscid & sipappsessionid parameters are Weblogic SIP server parameters.
wlsscid - Identifies the cluster ID of the cluster that originated the SIP
message during a software upgrade. The sideways forwarding mechanism uses this
attribute to ensure that messages are delivered to a compatib
> On receiving 407 for the intiail INvITE request, should the Route-set
> be updated in the caller side?
No. And the inability to ensure that the adjusted INVITE will traverse the
same path corresponding to the failure response (401, 407, 488, 422, ...) is a
known limitation within SIP commonly
Hi,
On receiving 407 for the intiail INvITE request, should the Route-set be
updated in the caller side?
Pl clarify.
Best Regards,
Mohammed Hanifa
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbi
2009/7/30 T Satyanarayana-A12694 :
> If the above is correct, "anonym...@anonymous.invalid;user=phone" is not
> valid.
>
> Any comments from others?
100% agree.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columb
