Re: [Sip-implementors] How to handle 183/SDP followed by 180/SDP?

2009-08-09 Thread Abhishek Dhammawat
Hi Aryan The UAC should accept the first reliable provisional response SDP as the answer. Please refer section 13.2.1 of RFC 3261 which states "If the initial offer is in an INVITE, the answer MUST be in a reliable non-failure message from UAS back to UAC which is correlated to that INVITE. Fo

Re: [Sip-implementors] How to handle 183/SDP followed by 180/SDP?

2009-08-09 Thread sumit jindal
Hi Aryan, whichever is first reliable 1xx (out of 180 and 183 ) response containing SDP. Regards, Sumit Jindal On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Aryan wrote: > Hi All, > If UAC receives 183/SDP, then it also receives 180/SDP, then which SDP > should be accepted as answer ? > > -- > Best Reg

[Sip-implementors] How to handle 183/SDP followed by 180/SDP?

2009-08-09 Thread Aryan
Hi All, If UAC receives 183/SDP, then it also receives 180/SDP, then which SDP should be accepted as answer ? -- Best Regards Aryan ___ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listi

Re: [Sip-implementors] Implementation of SUBSCRIBE msg

2009-08-09 Thread Avasarala Ranjit-A20990
Regards Ranjit -Original Message- From: rishabh [mailto:rishabh.j...@coraltele.com] Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 11:07 AM To: Avasarala Ranjit-A20990 Cc: sip fourm Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Implementation of SUBSCRIBE msg Hello, This is the message I get when i SUBSCRIBE the

Re: [Sip-implementors] Implementation of SUBSCRIBE msg

2009-08-09 Thread rishabh
Hello, This is the message I get when i SUBSCRIBE the sip server for the very first time after REGISTARTION. From: 300 ;tag=79741e81 To: 300 Call-Id: ff4000012...@pbxtestin.coralsip.com Cseq: 1669311045 SUBSCRIBE Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.4.140:5060;branch=z9hG4bKd54a46324b23a3cc Ww

Re: [Sip-implementors] Implementation of SUBSCRIBE msg

2009-08-09 Thread rishabh
T Satyanarayana, Yes i copy the same nonce as it is asked in 401 unauthorized. Regards Rishabh Jain T Satyanarayana-A12694 wrote: > Rishabh, > > Are you copying nonce from 401 to SUBSCRIBE? > > Regards > Satya T > > -Original Message- > From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.

Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP OPTIONS

2009-08-09 Thread Manoj Priyankara [TG]
Thanks Paul. // Its reasonable for checking general availability of the UA, assuming of course that you know the URI of the UA, rather than just of the AOR. Thanks, Paul > BR, > Manoj > > > -Original Message- > From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:pkyzi...@cisco.com] > Sent

Re: [Sip-implementors] Implementation of SUBSCRIBE msg

2009-08-09 Thread Tarun2 Gupta
Hi Rishabh Is the second 401 exactly similar to the first one, is there a stale parameter present in the second 401 along with the nonce? If yes, the server is implying that the old nonce is no longer valid and you will have to recalculate the response. Regards, Tarun Gupta Aricent

Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP OPTIONS

2009-08-09 Thread Paul Kyzivat
Manoj Priyankara [TG] wrote: > Hi Paul, > Thanks! Hope you are doing well! > > This is not to check whether a particular dialog is alive. But to check > whether the UAS is alive. This might be useful when a particular UAC > such as an IAD wants to know the liveness of the UAS. > > I've seen s

Re: [Sip-implementors] Implementation of SUBSCRIBE msg

2009-08-09 Thread Michael Procter
2009/8/8 rishabh : > Authorization:Digest > realm="coralsip.com",nonce="1f1dc547e232c64e39f3d4c45492fcac4a7d124b",uri="sip:192.168.4.2",username="300",response="39a7a9c42e2e431f5bc08b5d52274c6b" > > > But still i am getting the same 401 unauthorized  message from server. > > So can u suggest what