Re: [Sip-implementors] Requests sent within early dialog -- CSeq mgmt

2009-08-26 Thread Dushyant Dhalia
1. UPDATE is a new transaction for which the CSeq must be incremented. 2. CANCEL is a special case similar to ACK in which CSeq is numerically same as that of INVITE. Dushyant Szilagyi, Mike wrote: I've not been able to find definitive text regarding this issue so I'm hoping someone can prov

Re: [Sip-implementors] Requests sent within early dialog -- CSeq mgmt

2009-08-26 Thread Neel Balasubramanian
See below. Thanks, Neel. > -Original Message- > From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip- > implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Szilagyi, Mike > Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 4:11 PM > To: dispa...@ietf.org; sipc...@ietf.org; sip- > implemen

[Sip-implementors] Requests sent within early dialog -- CSeq mgmt

2009-08-26 Thread Szilagyi, Mike
I've not been able to find definitive text regarding this issue so I'm hoping someone can provide clarification. If a request (INFO or UPDATE) is sent on a dialog in the early state, how are the CSeq numbers managed by the UAS. Here's an example to demonstrate my confusion: UAC UA

Re: [Sip-implementors] authentication and 407

2009-08-26 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
2009/8/26 shyam : >    When I am sending a INVITE to CSCF I am getting a 407 "Proxy > Authorization" response. > > Is there a way to avoid it? This is SIP world. > I heard that by including authentication parameters in the FIRST INVITE we > can avoid the 407. Please, read RFC 2617 (Diggest aut

Re: [Sip-implementors] authentication and 407

2009-08-26 Thread Rohit Aggarwal
Hi Even if you include credentials in initial request, it may still be challenged. You can probably check if there is any configuration to disable authentication at the server with which you are testing. Regards Rohit Aggarwal Aricent -Original Message- From: sip-implementors-b

[Sip-implementors] authentication and 407

2009-08-26 Thread shyam
Hi All, When I am sending a INVITE to CSCF I am getting a 407 "Proxy Authorization" response. Is there a way to avoid it? I heard that by including authentication parameters in the FIRST INVITE we can avoid the 407. If so which header and which parameters have to be included. I do not

[Sip-implementors] Importance of TARGET URI paramter

2009-08-26 Thread rishabh
Dear all, What if i am not using this paramater in notification of BUSY LAMP FIELD  after the target URI parametr in the message body.. Can any body explain the importance of this and what is its use... Regards Rishabh Jain ___ Sip-implementors

Re: [Sip-implementors] Importance of version & dialog id

2009-08-26 Thread Vivek Batra
To implement Busy Lamp Field (BLF), you should refer RFC 4235. Best Regards, Vivek Batra -Original Message- From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of rishabh Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 12:53 PM To

Re: [Sip-implementors] Importance of version & dialog id

2009-08-26 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
El Miércoles, 26 de Agosto de 2009, rishabh escribió: > what is the use of version and dialog state in SUBSCRIBE & NOTIFY message. All this stuff is well explained in the RFC 3265: "version": http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3265#section-4.3.2 About the dialog... what do you want to know exactly?

[Sip-implementors] Importance of version & dialog id

2009-08-26 Thread rishabh
what is the use of version and dialog state in SUBSCRIBE & NOTIFY message. When we are using them for Busy Lamp Field. Thanks & Regards Rishabh Jain ___ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/c