Re: [Sip-implementors] [Sipping] how to response the offer

2009-08-28 Thread Dushyant Dhalia
see my response inline. Tanu Kapoor wrote: Hello SunYongGuang, A should consider incoming SDP as new offer and answer appropriately, quite likely as you mention the offer has not changed it would send a 180 or 200 OK response with same parameters as negotiated first time. In any case A should

[Sip-implementors] Restarting Timer F/B on rfc3263 defined failure

2009-08-28 Thread Taisto Qvist XX
Hi Folks, I'm retransmitting a question I asked a few months ago, about the 3263-retrying mechanism. It concerns the text about retrying after fatal transport errors, using a completely new transaction: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RFC 3263 4.3 Details of

[Sip-implementors] Multiple path headers in Request

2009-08-28 Thread priyank luthra
Hi What would be the behaviour of a proxy/Registrar receiving a REGISTER with multiple path headers, like REGISTER sip:REGISTRAR.EXAMPLEHOME.COM SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 112.68.155.4:5060;branch=z9hG4bK34ghi7ab04 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.0.2.4:5060;branch=z9hG4bKnashds7 To: UA1

Re: [Sip-implementors] Multiple path headers in Request

2009-08-28 Thread sumit jindal
Hello Priyank, I think it's same as coma seperated values. Regards, Sumit Jindal On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:21 PM, priyank luthra priyank.lut...@gmail.comwrote: Hi What would be the behaviour of a proxy/Registrar receiving a REGISTER with multiple path headers, like REGISTER

Re: [Sip-implementors] [Sip] Question on draft-ietf-sip-outbound-20 draft: multiple flowcreation

2009-08-28 Thread Vavilapalli Srikanth-A19563
Hi Thanks for the reply..One more of clarification required.. So If UA wishes to create multiple transport flows with sip:primary.example.com(As specified in draft-ietf-sip-outbound-20#section-13 to honor RFC3261 requirement for message size greater than MTU), would it be OK it one FLOW lands

Re: [Sip-implementors] Multiple path headers in Request

2009-08-28 Thread Harsha Ramanagoudra
Priyank, Section 7.3.1 in RFC 3261 answers your query. Implementations MUST be able to process multiple header field rows with the same name in any combination of the single-value-per-line or comma-separated value forms. The case you have mentioned refers to single value per line.

[Sip-implementors] Bridged Line appearance.

2009-08-28 Thread Suresh Arunachalam
Hi How do we handle fragmented packets on SIP. I have been having problem of handling Notifiication message with over MTU size. Often the dialog state information on notification mesage xml body crosses 700 ~ 800 bytes making message size over 1500 bytes. Help is highly appreciated in this

Re: [Sip-implementors] [Sip] Question on draft-ietf-sip-outbound-20 draft: multipleflowcreation

2009-08-28 Thread Francois Audet
I honestly don't know why anybody would want to do both UDP and TCP. (In other words, if you set up a TCP flow, I don't see a benefit in also setting up a UDP flow which you will have to maintain for keep alives). From: sip-boun...@ietf.org