> Hi all,I was looking for a way to send proprietory information in a sip
> call. I had posted a mail few days back regarding the same topic( See the
> mailing list below for details). The reponse was to use a private header,
> but that is ruled out since intermediate proxies may ignore or remove
Also
to consider is if the provisional responses have different To tags,
i.e. they are coming from different endpoints (proxy could have
forked) , in which case you should honor whatever provisional response
your are getting until
you get the final 200OK
Cheers
On Oct 25, 2009, at 11:59 PM
RFC3960 offers solution for this scenario.
-Arun
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Vadim Lebedev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What would be the correct behaviour for a UAC:
>
> At Time T0 the UAC send an INVITE with an SDP
> at T1 it gets back an 183 Session in Progress responce
> wth an SDP
Hello,
What would be the correct behaviour for a UAC:
At Time T0 the UAC send an INVITE with an SDP
atT1 it gets back an 183 Session in Progress responce
wth an SDP describing an early media stream
atT2 it gets a 180 RINGING responce WITHOUT an SDP
atT3
El Domingo, 25 de Octubre de 2009, Laurent Etiemble escribió:
> Hello,
>
> X-3GPP-Intended-Identity header is not mandatory in the 3GPP or OMA
> contexts.
> Usually, the username used in authentication challenge
> serves as the identity to be used inside the XDM server.
But this doesn't make sen
Hello,
X-3GPP-Intended-Identity header is not mandatory in the 3GPP or OMA
contexts. Usually, the username used in authentication challenge
serves as the identity to be used inside the XDM server.
The header may be used when a single username can be associated to
multiple identities (think of imp
