Re: [Sip-implementors] 407 Authentication failure

2010-01-14 Thread Alok 2 Tiwari
Hi Josep, When a request is challenged with 407 (containing proxy-authenticate header), the request should be re-submitted with proxy-authorization header. Please refer the following section is RFC-3261: 22.3 Proxy-to-User Authentication Similarly, when a UAC sends a request to a prox

Re: [Sip-implementors] Is anonymous user allowed in sip-uri with user=phone?

2010-01-14 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
El Jueves, 14 de Enero de 2010, Paul Kyzivat escribió: > To be anonymous with a tel URI, just lie and use somebody else's number. > Or, you could do something like: > > tel:0;phone-context=anonymous.invalid > > But AFAIK there is no *standard* way of doing it. That's the problem :( -- Iñaki

Re: [Sip-implementors] Is anonymous user allowed in sip-uri with user=phone?

2010-01-14 Thread Paul Kyzivat
To be anonymous with a tel URI, just lie and use somebody else's number. Or, you could do something like: tel:0;phone-context=anonymous.invalid But AFAIK there is no *standard* way of doing it. Thanks, Paul Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > El Miércoles, 13 de Enero de 2010, Paul Kyzi

[Sip-implementors] 407 Authentication failure

2010-01-14 Thread Josep Benavent
Hello, I'm developing a UA using JAIN-SIP that connect to Asterisk server and I can't complete an INVITE process correctly. The dialogue I implemented is: 1. Send register 2. Received a trying and a 401 Unauthorized 3. I send a register again with the authorization header (with the nonce and the

Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 3323 Privacy vs. RPID

2010-01-14 Thread Allan Sandfeld Jensen
On Tuesday 12 January 2010, Uttam Sarkar wrote: > I think if Privacy header has value of "none" then it is similar to one > that does not have Privacy header at all. User 1 has no objection for > displaying it's identity to the end user (User 2). > This is not my interpretation. If a user has requ