Re: [Sip-implementors] CSeq of retried INVITE

2010-01-29 Thread Dale Worley
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 19:30 +0900, OKUMURA Shinji wrote: > Consider the following scenario. > > | INVITE(CSeq:1)| > |--->| > || > | 18x | > |<---| > |

Re: [Sip-implementors] CSeq of retried INVITE

2010-01-29 Thread Paul Kyzivat
Once the first INVITE has failed, and early dialog it might have had is gone. The retried INVITE is working toward establishing a new dialog. So the CSeq values are for that dialog. I think that means the CSeq numbering should be permitted to restart. OTOH, if there are any messages still in tr

Re: [Sip-implementors] CSeq of retried INVITE

2010-01-29 Thread ViVeK tAlWaR
According to RFC 3261 "CSeq or Command Sequence contains an integer and a method name. The CSeq number is incremented for each new request within a dialog and is a traditional sequence number. " CSeq increment is not done for specific request it is done for all the request in the

Re: [Sip-implementors] CSeq of retried INVITE

2010-01-29 Thread Dushyant Dhalia
It must be greater that or equal to 3. Dushyant P S Dhalia OKUMURA Shinji wrote: Hi, I have a question regarding CSeq of retried INVITE. Consider the following scenario. | INVITE(CSeq:1)| |--->| || | 18x

Re: [Sip-implementors] CSeq of retried INVITE

2010-01-29 Thread Rohit Aggarwal
CSeq would anyways need to be incremented since previous request has been responded and this is supposed to be a new request as against the retransmission of previous request. Another case would be sending 2nd INVITE with a different Call-ID. Regards Rohit Aggarwal -Original Message- Fr

[Sip-implementors] CSeq of retried INVITE

2010-01-29 Thread OKUMURA Shinji
Hi, I have a question regarding CSeq of retried INVITE. Consider the following scenario. | INVITE(CSeq:1)| |--->| || | 18x | |<---| |