Re: [Sip-implementors] Private media - is this even possible?

2010-07-27 Thread Ashwin Kumar
can u paste tcpdump of above scenario here ? On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 4:12 PM, SCG2 wrote: > Please bear with me: > > > > I have two SPA phones behind the same NATd router (i.e. the same public IP) > - Phone A and Phone B. > > > > Phone A calls Phone B. > > > > I (my switch) am trying to detect t

[Sip-implementors] Private media - is this even possible?

2010-07-27 Thread SCG2
Please bear with me: I have two SPA phones behind the same NATd router (i.e. the same public IP) - Phone A and Phone B. Phone A calls Phone B. I (my switch) am trying to detect this condition and, upon receipt of the ACK from Phone A to complete call setup, I (the switch) am attempting

Re: [Sip-implementors] 302 direct by Proxy violating spec??

2010-07-27 Thread WORLEY, Dale R (Dale)
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Nauman Sulaiman [nauman762-h...@yahoo.co.uk] THe VoipFone server sends a cancel straight after the 180 ring, Sipgate doesn't do this however

Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 3261, 100 Trying on Re-Invite

2010-07-27 Thread WORLEY, Dale R (Dale)
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Mia Cizmic [mia.ciz...@ericsson.com] Namely, we have sent a Re-Invite on an existing session and received 100 Trying reply. 100 Trying reply

Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 3261, 100 Trying on Re-Invite

2010-07-27 Thread Sumit Jindal
Hi Mia you can go through thread with title "How long can a Dialog be in Early state". dated 10th July 2010. Even though it's for initial request but help you understand timer in a better way. also read below bug and RFC 5057 (how final responses to transaction affect dialog). http://bugs.sipit.n