Can you please check if it's a re-INVITE within a dialog (matching to-tag,
from-tag and call-id) or new INVITE (no to-tag, from-tag and call-id)?
If its really re-INVITE, then this case should also be handled and *must* not
be treated as new dialog.
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
F
Yes, this behaviour is valid, as per spec 3264, This is called delayed sdp
negotiation.
Thanks/Regards
Satyakumar | Technical Lead | HelloSoft India Pvt Ltd., |
www.hellosoft.com | Hyderabad, IN | +91-04023327062
- Original Message -
From: "Pete Kay"
To:
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010
I am running a b2bua with freeswitch. It is fine until a Mitel UAS
starts sending INVITE without sdp and ACK with sdp. Freeswitch seems
to treat it as another dialog and sends it to dialplan handling. It
is using sofia as the sip stack.
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Shanbhag, Somesh (NSN -
Yes, As per 3261, sec 12.1.2, the subsequent insession messages will built
Route header, based on Record-Route received.
Thanks/Regards
Satyakumar | Technical Lead | HelloSoft India Pvt Ltd., |
www.hellosoft.com | Hyderabad, IN | +91-04023327062
- Original Message -
From: "fuliang yuan"
Folks,
Gonzalo and I produced an Internet Draft aiming at trying to bring some
consistency to the way in which SIP user agents implement an OPTIONS "ping"
procedure. It seems that a very large number of vendors do this, but
unfortunately, there seems to be little consistency.
Initially, we
I think its valid. But mostly you would end up getting the last negotiated SDP
from UAC.
Whats the specific use case?
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
[mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of ext Pete
Hi,
If UAS sends an re-invite without SDP and instead put the SDP in the
ACK reply, is this valid?
Thanks,
p
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
Yes; rfc3261 section 16.12 provides a good summary and example concerning
Record-Route entries with and without the "lr" parameter.
> -Original Message-
> From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-
> implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of fuliang y
Hi,
Yes, BYE request is sent within the established Dialog. Route Set was
defined during initial INVITE transaction and it applied to whole dialog.
Kind regards,
- Tomasz Zieleniewski
--
ICT Backyard - http://ictbackyard.com
On 11 August 2010 22:13, fuliang yuan wro
Hi,
Here is the call scenario:
INVITE with Record-Route >
<=== 200 OK
(INVITE)
ACK without Record-route ===>
<=== BYE
200 OK (BY
10 matches
Mail list logo
