Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP Offer ANswer

2010-11-03 Thread Paul Kyzivat
I *think* you have gotten a valid response from other respondents, but I'm not certain about the question. You say the terminating party supports 100rel, but does the originating party indicate support for 100rel? That is a necessity to use reliable provisionals. The thing you want to read is d

Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP Offer ANswer

2010-11-03 Thread Alex Balashov
You are confusing the offer with the answer. For an answer, the answer must be in the first reliable non-failure response to the INVITE transaction, be that non-100 1xx or 2xx. On Wed, November 3, 2010 2:58 am, Ayyanar P K wrote: > Isn't there a contradiction, RFC3261 says must be sent in relia

Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP Offer ANswer

2010-11-03 Thread SIP Satan
It is a must to resend SDP in 200 OK if SDP sent was in an unreliable response(180 with out reliability), This is because tehre are no ways to confirm if SDP in 180 is reached the server. On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:44 AM, AGRAWAL, VINEET (VINEET) wrote: > Please clarify other doubts. > In SIP ter