12 jan 2011 kl. 00.01 skrev Daniel-Constantin Mierla:
> Hello,
>
> On 1/11/11 11:20 PM, James Blaisdell wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> A couple of us are planning to attend SipIt in April. This is a little
>> early, anyone interested in DTLS-SRTP (RFC 5764) interop testing?
>>
>> Our current config:
Hello Daniel,
Yes, we found Kamailio very easy to use with TLS. You have a done a great job
on this project! Our phone client is connecting and working fine with
Kamailio, using SIP over TLS. We are using DTLS for end-to-end secure phone
call between the two handsets. DTLS generates (RFC 57
Hello James,
On 1/12/11 12:27 AM, James Blaisdell wrote:
> Hello Daniel,
>
> We have working prototype phone app for various mobile platforms (e.g.
> Android, iPhone, etc). We're likely going to release sometime this summer,
> but would be interested in betas, etc. fyi, we should work fine wit
Hello Daniel,
We have working prototype phone app for various mobile platforms (e.g. Android,
iPhone, etc). We're likely going to release sometime this summer, but would be
interested in betas, etc. fyi, we should work fine with a Kamailio + Asterisk
configuration, but we haven't tested that
Hello,
On 1/11/11 11:20 PM, James Blaisdell wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A couple of us are planning to attend SipIt in April. This is a little
> early, anyone interested in DTLS-SRTP (RFC 5764) interop testing?
>
> Our current config: handset running our client connected to SIP/TLS to
> Kamailio; with
Hello,
A couple of us are planning to attend SipIt in April. This is a little early,
anyone interested in DTLS-SRTP (RFC 5764) interop testing?
Our current config: handset running our client connected to SIP/TLS to
Kamailio; with handset to handset using DTLS-SRTP. TLS and DTLS
implementatio
11 jan 2011 kl. 11.20 skrev Saúl Ibarra Corretgé:
>> I thought of that - but what would we put there that everyone could support?
>>
>
> For the codec related 488, a 305 "Incompatible media format" could be
> used. For IPv4/IPv6 stuff, 300 "Incompatible network protocol" or 301
> "Incompatible
> I thought of that - but what would we put there that everyone could support?
>
For the codec related 488, a 305 "Incompatible media format" could be
used. For IPv4/IPv6 stuff, 300 "Incompatible network protocol" or 301
"Incompatible network address formats" could help.
If none of them suit the
10 jan 2011 kl. 22.19 skrev Saúl Ibarra Corretgé:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
>>
>> 10 jan 2011 kl. 14.07 skrev Kevin P. Fleming:
>>
>>> On 01/10/2011 03:59 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
The draft changes the SDP offer/answer model so that an answer has to u
