[Sip-implementors] Any SIP Application with MSRP?

2011-02-02 Thread Jack
All, Is there any SIP Application server supported with MSRP? any responses/pointers is highly appreciated!!! Regards, ___ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-impleme

[Sip-implementors] Nat traversal (failed to receive ack message)

2011-02-02 Thread prashant jain
Hello, I have a set up in which there are two sip client behind the NAT(restrictive) and through ICE they are establishing the connection.I have a douobt in the INVITE call establishment flow. Since SIP inherently have the capability tp traverse through the NAT (by received from argument in the vi

Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP asymmetric format parameters

2011-02-02 Thread Worley, Dale R (Dale)
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Raphael Tryster [raphael.trys...@teledata-networks.com] The statement that "registered payload numbers *MUST NOT* be used for any format oth

Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on Handling of null ipv6 address in SDP c= line

2011-02-02 Thread Brett Tate
The following draft updates RFC 3264. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sipping-v6-transition-07 The .invalid is used for ipv6. The working group didn't like 0.0.0.0 for ipv4; however it was basically grandfathered in for ipv4. The following link discusses some of this. http://www.ietf.

[Sip-implementors] Query on Handling of null ipv6 address in SDP c= line

2011-02-02 Thread bindukumari.r
Hi All, Please clarify how to handle NULL IPv6 address in SDP c= line. According to the following snippet of RFC 3264 "RFC 2543 [10] specified that placing a user on hold was accomplished by setting the connection address to 0.0.0.0. Its usage for putting a call on hold is