[Sip-implementors] Query regarding Network-Authentication

2011-03-02 Thread Vijaya Kumar MG
Hi All, Please clarify the below query regarding network authentication. While making a call through server, when the callee accepts the call, server is adding Authentication-Info header in 200 OK response to INVITE request. INVITE ---> 407 <--

Re: [Sip-implementors] SUBSCRIBE request username

2011-03-02 Thread Worley, Dale R (Dale)
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Bucur Marius [bucur_marius_ovi...@yahoo.com] When subscribing one's mailbox, through the message-summary event package, the presentity usern

Re: [Sip-implementors] SUBSCRIBE request username

2011-03-02 Thread Brett Tate
> I recently came across an issue with some SUBSCRIBE requests > having no username in the request URI. > Is a message-summary SUBSCRIBE request without a username > in the request URI valid? The generic answer is yes for both SUBSCRIBE and re-SUBSCRIBE. A "userinfo" portion of a SIP-URI is

[Sip-implementors] SUBSCRIBE request username

2011-03-02 Thread Bucur Marius
Hello, I recently came across an issue with some SUBSCRIBE requests having no username in the request URI. I was wondering if this kind of request is legal or not. RFC3265 states: "The Request URI of a SUBSCRIBE request, most importantly, contains enough information to route the request to the

Re: [Sip-implementors] ascii encoding

2011-03-02 Thread Paul Kyzivat
On 3/1/2011 6:03 AM, Nikos Leontsinis wrote: > I am not sure if implementors are obliged to honour this request. Implementors are obliged to honor whats written in specs if they want to claim compliance to the spec, and to interoperate with other compliant implementations. If you don't care a

Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Server

2011-03-02 Thread Dmitry Akindinov
Hello, On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 20:30:26 +0900 Evgeniy Khramtsov wrote: [] > What really simple to configure is CGP: it has a good management > console > and well-formed documentation (no need to "dig"). But alas, it is > not free of charge... It' free for up to five accounts, which is quite

Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Server

2011-03-02 Thread Evgeniy Khramtsov
02.03.2011 19:41, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > >>> If that is still hard, then go for sip:provider CE - after you install >>> it, then you just play with the web interface for managing sip >>> accounts for your phones. >> Thank you for the tips, but I don't need that :) > So if you don't like

Re: [Sip-implementors] URI Header parameter

2011-03-02 Thread Brett Tate
It is discussed within RFC 3261 section 19.1.5. Some Refer-To examples are within RFC 3515 section 2.1. > -Original Message- > From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip- > implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of uma maheswar > vankam > Sent: Wednes

Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Server

2011-03-02 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 3/2/11 11:12 AM, Evgeniy Khramtsov wrote: > 02.03.2011 17:25, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: >> Have you played with kamailio 3.1? You barely touch the config file >> for most of the features there, just need to add simple lines like: >> !#define WITH_XYZ and that's it for enabling specific f

Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Server

2011-03-02 Thread Evgeniy Khramtsov
02.03.2011 17:25, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > > Have you played with kamailio 3.1? You barely touch the config file > for most of the features there, just need to add simple lines like: > !#define WITH_XYZ and that's it for enabling specific functionality > (e.g., WITH_AUTH, WITH_NAT, WITH

Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Server

2011-03-02 Thread sumiya marugami
SIP Express Router (SER) is a high-performance, configurable, free SIP server licensed under the open-source GNU license . http://www.iptel.org/ser/ > On 2011-03-01 19:18, Siga wrote: >> Hi, >> I need to test my SIP Client, can somebody recommend me which SIP Server is >> good and easy to set up

Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Server

2011-03-02 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 3/2/11 6:44 AM, Evgeniy Khramtsov wrote: > 02.03.2011 14:38, Alex Balashov wrote: >> Evgeniy, >> >> Its stock config file has come a long way in accomodating most >> commonsensical needs. >> > Sure, just like sendmail.cf :) Have you played with kamailio 3.1? You barely touch the config file fo

Re: [Sip-implementors] NAT traversal failing

2011-03-02 Thread Dmitry Akindinov
Hello, On 2011-03-01 13:33, anand madhab wrote: > In case of symmetric NAT it is not able to receice direct ACK... what > we can do to this ? To support NAT'ed clients their SIP Proxies should stay in the SIP dialog path, by inserting appropriate Record-Route headers. > Regards, > Anand Madhab

Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Server

2011-03-02 Thread Dmitry Akindinov
Hello, On 2011-03-01 19:18, Siga wrote: > Hi, > I need to test my SIP Client, can somebody recommend me which SIP Server is > good and easy to set up and can be used to test my SIP Client, especially I > need it for testing sending and receiving data packets from my Client Try CommuniGate Pro

[Sip-implementors] Query regarding Network-authentication

2011-03-02 Thread Vijaya Kumar MG
Hi All,     Please clarify the below query regarding network authentication.  While making a call through server, when the callee accepts the call, server is adding Authentication-Info header in 200 OK response to INVITE request.    INVITE --->                 4