On 8/11/11 3:00 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2011/8/11 Paul Kyzivat:
>> That contrasts with a case where the example.com server receives a
>> request for sip:al...@example.com and discovers that "al...@example.com"
>> is not in the location server, so that registrations for it could not
>> succe
On 08/12/2011 03:00 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2011/8/11 Paul Kyzivat:
>> That contrasts with a case where the example.com server receives a
>> request for sip:al...@example.com and discovers that "al...@example.com"
>> is not in the location server, so that registrations for it could not
>> s
Hello Mahesh,
Did you get answer to your question about SIP pay phone. I am trying to
implement SIP based payphones. Did you get the information you were looking
for. Would you mind sharing the info with me.
- ramesh
___
Sip-implementors mailing
2011/8/11 Paul Kyzivat :
> That contrasts with a case where the example.com server receives a
> request for sip:al...@example.com and discovers that "al...@example.com"
> is not in the location server, so that registrations for it could not
> succeed. In that case 404 not found is appropriate.
Whe
Though in the systems I've worked on, this problem rarely arises, as any
legitimate user has a voicemail account. Thus, for an AOR for a user that
exists in the system, there is always at least one contact point (the voicemail
system).
Dale
___
Sip-
On 8/11/11 12:53 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2011/8/11 Kevin P. Fleming:
>> You are talking about two different things; it's completely possible for
>> a callee's end system to be registered, but for that person to be 'not
>> logged in' (and thus unavailable to receive calls). Having a contact
2011/8/11 Kevin P. Fleming :
> You are talking about two different things; it's completely possible for
> a callee's end system to be registered, but for that person to be 'not
> logged in' (and thus unavailable to receive calls). Having a contact URI
> registered at the callee's AoR does not mean
On 08/11/2011 10:13 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2011/8/11 Kevin P. Fleming:
>>> 21.4.18 480 Temporarily Unavailable
>>>
>>> The callee's end system was contacted successfully but the callee is
>>> currently unavailable (for example, is not logged in, logged in but
>>> in a state
2011/8/11 Kevin P. Fleming :
>> 21.4.18 480 Temporarily Unavailable
>>
>> The callee's end system was contacted successfully but the callee is
>> currently unavailable (for example, is not logged in, logged in but
>> in a state that precludes communication with the callee, or has
>>
> Based on what this says, a 480 response is not appropriate
> for the case where the AoR is not currently mapped to any
> Contact URIs (as the in the OP's query). If there are no
> Contact URIs registered for the AoR, then the "callee's
> end system" cannot have been "contacted successfully".
On 08/11/2011 03:30 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2011/8/11 Saúl Ibarra Corretgé:
>> I've seen code 434 User Not Online being used many times, but I could not
>> find any reference to where/if its standardized :-S
>
> That would be some ugly/limited vendor not understanding section
> 21.4.18 in
2011/8/11 Saúl Ibarra Corretgé :
> I've seen code 434 User Not Online being used many times, but I could not
> find any reference to where/if its standardized :-S
That would be some ugly/limited vendor not understanding section
21.4.18 in RFC 3261:
21.4.18 480 Temporarily Unavailable
The cal
2011/8/11 Rajat Chandna :
> "If the Request-URI indicates a resource at this proxy that does not
> exist, the proxy MUST return a 404 (Not Found) response."
No. 404 means "does not exist". I can be logged off and still exist, don't I?
95% of people is wrong and use 404 for this purpose. Wrong,
Refer 21.4.18 of RFC 3261, It should be 480 Temporarily unavailable.
Anand.
-Original Message-
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
[mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Saúl
Ibarra Corretgé
Sent: 11 August 2011 13:05
To: Romel Khan
Cc: sip
On Aug 11, 2011, at 2:28 AM, Romel Khan wrote:
> What SIP code should a proxy send back to a caller if the UA the caller is
> trying to reach is currently not logged in? Please provide the sip rfc
> quote. Thanks.
I've seen code 434 User Not Online being used many times, but I could not find
an
15 matches
Mail list logo
