From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
[sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Iñaki Baz
Castillo [i...@aliax.net]
Well, my question was just:
"where could I get the list of exisiting values for Proxy-Require
header? A
2011/9/19 Paul Kyzivat :
> Yes. But I think you have asked the wrong question.
Well, my question was just:
"where could I get the list of exisiting values for Proxy-Require
header? Also, what are commonly implemented/used?"
:)
> The question you should be asking is:
>
> which option tag values
On 9/19/11 11:24 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2011/9/19 Worley, Dale R (Dale):
>> Well, the behavior if they are used in Proxy-Require is specified,
>> but you should check the RFC to see whether it is supposed to be
>> used. E.g., the text in sip-parameters talks about using "Proxy-Require:
>>
On 09/19/2011 11:17 AM, Rajat Chandna wrote:
> Yes, the direct Ip call will succeed.
Or... at least, there is nothing in the RFCs that would cause a call
between RFC-conforming endpoints to fail given the scenario the OP
outlined (minimal as it was). The RFCs would *expect* such a call to
succ
Hi Mahudeswarnan,
Yes, the direct Ip call will succeed.
Thanks and Regards,
Rajat Chandna
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
[sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Mahudeswaran
[mahudeswar...@acqueon.com]
Sent: Mo
> From: Mahudeswaran [mahudeswar...@acqueon.com]
>
> Will the voice call succeed if two SIP endpoints talk to each other in the
> Internet.
Yes.
Dale
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.e
2011/9/19 Worley, Dale R (Dale) :
> Well, the behavior if they are used in Proxy-Require is specified,
> but you should check the RFC to see whether it is supposed to be
> used. E.g., the text in sip-parameters talks about using "Proxy-Require:
> 199", but RFC 6228 forbids using that in any situat
Hi,
Will the voice call succeed if two SIP endpoints talk to each other in the
Internet.
e.g.
sip-ua-1, sip-ua-2 running in public IP's.
sip-ua-1 initiate a call to sip-ua-2 via direct ip calling.
Will the call succeed.
Thanks.
___
Sip-implementors m
> From: Iñaki Baz Castillo [i...@aliax.net]
>
> Oh, there are. For example "199", "gin", "privacy"
Well, the behavior if they are used in Proxy-Require is specified,
but you should check the RFC to see whether it is supposed to be
used. E.g., the text in sip-parameters talks about using "Pro
2011/9/19 Worley, Dale R (Dale) :
> I believe that
> *no* option-tags have been specified for Proxy-Require
Oh, there are. For example "199", "gin", "privacy"
http://www.iana.org/assignments/sip-parameters
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
___
Sip-implemen
The SIP Forum's test event SIPit #29 will be hosted by ETSI October 24–28, 2011
in Monte Carlo, Monaco. It's an important event for all of you that wants to
test your code, meet other SIP developers, meet authors of RFCs and - in
general - spend one week working hard with SIP.
SIPit covers all
> From: Iñaki Baz Castillo [i...@aliax.net]
>
> Hi, where could I get the list of exisiting values for Proxy-Require header?
> Also, what are commonly implemented/used?
The registry for option-tags does not specify which tags can be used
in Proxy-Require versus which are to be used in Require. I
12 matches
Mail list logo
