Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 4474 and Request Message

My question was why can't be 4474 based authentication can't be used for ReQUEST method?? As RFC says REQUEST uses header fields in a peculliar way( as far as I know, REQUEST method has to from header having same field). So why does this cause any problem to authentication? Regards, Vineet Menon

[Sip-implementors] How to transfer an existing subscription from one RLS server to another

Hi, I am implementing an RLS service that shares load via DNS/SRV records. Let us say I have 2 RLS servers sharing the load equally for 200 subscribers. In an ideal setting, each would service 100 subscribers each. In the moment one goes down, subscribers from the other server spills over

Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 3261: Authorization UTF8-NONASCII and escaping

2011/12/6 Brett Tate : > The following are some questions concerning SIP Digest MD5 Authorization. > > 1) Are UTF8-NONASCII allowed within username and realm?  Based upon the ABNF, > it appears to be yes.  However since SIP authentication is based upon the > HTTP specs (such as rfc2617 and rfc261

Re: [Sip-implementors] Duplication of SIP Header

On 12/7/11 12:06 AM, Brez Borland wrote: > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Paul Kyzivat > wrote: > > The examples below look like some sort of conformance test, rather than > cases that would actually be encountered in practice. If so, I suppose > either y

Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 4474 and Request Message

> From: Vineet Menon [mvineetme...@gmail.com] > > anybody having answer?? > > I want this answer desperately.please You've read the text in RFC 4744 which explains why CANCEL can't be authenticated. You speak of a "REQUEST" message, but I have no idea what that is. What is the actual p

Re: [Sip-implementors] Duplication of SIP Header

On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > The examples below look like some sort of conformance test, rather than > cases that would actually be encountered in practice. If so, I suppose > either you are implementing the tester and looking for what response to > expect, or else you ha

Re: [Sip-implementors] Duplication of SIP Header

Additionally, some of these are discussed within RFC 4475. > -Original Message- > From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip- > implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Paul Kyzivat > Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 10:36 AM > To: sip-implementors@lis

Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 200 to UPDATE without SDP

On 12/6/11 7:00 PM, Stefan Sayer wrote: > Hello, > > I am wondering what to do with an SDP in a 200 to an UPDATE without > SDP in an established dialog, for example as a response to a session > refresh triggered by SST. There is two cases: >- the SDP has not changed (to what is established) >

Re: [Sip-implementors] Duplication of SIP Header

The examples below look like some sort of conformance test, rather than cases that would actually be encountered in practice. If so, I suppose either you are implementing the tester and looking for what response to expect, or else you have failed a conformance test and are looking for an argume

[Sip-implementors] RFC 3261: Authorization UTF8-NONASCII and escaping

Howdy, The following are some questions concerning SIP Digest MD5 Authorization. 1) Are UTF8-NONASCII allowed within username and realm? Based upon the ABNF, it appears to be yes. However since SIP authentication is based upon the HTTP specs (such as rfc2617 and rfc2616), I'm not sure if the

Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 4474 and Request Message

anybody having answer?? I want this answer desperately.please Regards, Vineet Menon On 23 November 2011 11:57, Vineet Menon wrote: > Hi, > > I was going thru RFC 4474 and noticed that it has some trouble in dealing > with authentication in REQUEST and CANCEL message. > Has anyone w

Re: [Sip-implementors] Duplication of SIP Header

Can you tell which RFC required this king of behaviour??? I can't find any use for this kind of duplication.. Regards, Vineet Menon On 6 December 2011 16:12, Brez Borland wrote: > interesting, anybody to comment on this? > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Keerthi Srinivasan < > keerthiva

[Sip-implementors] SDP in 200 to UPDATE without SDP

Hello, I am wondering what to do with an SDP in a 200 to an UPDATE without SDP in an established dialog, for example as a response to a session refresh triggered by SST. There is two cases: - the SDP has not changed (to what is established) - the SDP has changed I can't find any text neithe

Re: [Sip-implementors] Duplication of SIP Header

interesting, anybody to comment on this? On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Keerthi Srinivasan < keerthivarmansriniva...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > If the SIP stack receives the duplication Mandatory SIP Header then the SIP > will send failure response or successful response. > > Ex: > Scenari