Re: [Sip-implementors] Query regarding SDP negotiation

2014-11-05 Thread ankur bansal
Saurav We always try to complete call somehow as providing reliable service to user is utmost important and i have seen solutions voilating standards in actual deployments to provide services to end user. And luckily in our scenario standard is recommending the acceptance of diff payloads to make c

Re: [Sip-implementors] Query regarding SDP negotiation

2014-11-05 Thread Paul Kyzivat
On 11/5/14 7:05 AM, Brett Tate wrote: But my newer question is even by sending BYE for this flow A is not violating any RFC. Since from the booth RFCs mentioned above the expected behavior mentioned by Ankur is SHOULD way not in MUST. So A behavior may not the be best one but also not a violatio

Re: [Sip-implementors] Query regarding SDP negotiation

2014-11-05 Thread Brett Tate
> But my newer question is even by sending BYE for this > flow A is not violating any RFC. Since from the booth > RFCs mentioned above the expected behavior mentioned > by Ankur is SHOULD way not in MUST. So A behavior > may not the be best one but also not a violation of RFC. > > Whether my above

Re: [Sip-implementors] Query regarding SDP negotiation

2014-11-05 Thread Rasik Jesadiya
Hi, I have observed two points here, 1. UA A doing wrong here in SDP Offer Here dynamic payload is used for registered CODER ALAW(8) & uLAW(0) & repetition of the same coder with different payload two times(one registered payload (e.g. 8,0) and one dynamic payload(e.g. 106,107)). > >a=rtpmap:10

Re: [Sip-implementors] Query regarding SDP negotiation

2014-11-05 Thread Jan Bollen
Hi Sourav,  Well, yes, there might be an indication in the BYE message or the UA's error log why the BYE is sent and/or why no media has been exchanged. If a media mismatch is the cause, one might have expected a 4XX response instead. You need a

Re: [Sip-implementors] Query regarding SDP negotiation

2014-11-05 Thread Sourav Dhar Chaudhuri
Hi Brett & Ankur, At first thanks to both of you for your prompt answer. So after considering RFC 3264 ( importantly the section 8.3.2 mentioned in Ankur's latest reply) & RFC 4566, I came to this conclusion instead of sending A could have continue the call. But my newer question is even