Thanks Paul and Brett for prompt response.
Regards,
Ambrish
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 11:41 PM, Paul Kyzivat
wrote:
> On 11/20/14 1:38 AM, Ambrish Kumar wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>> We read the RFC 3966 and understood that the global number should be
>> prefixed with “+” and if it is not prefixed
On 11/20/14 6:41 AM, Rajesh wrote:
Hi,
May I know whether it is fine if UA insert PAI header in the INVITE
message which it sends to a trusted network entity. I am analysing one
scenario where one of our network node gets a call from another trusted
node with From set to Anonymous and PAI hea
On 11/20/14 1:38 AM, Ambrish Kumar wrote:
Hi All,
We read the RFC 3966 and understood that the global number should be
prefixed with “+” and if it is not prefixed with “+” then it is considered
to be a local number and a phone-context is a MUST.
But the section 7.4 is a bit confusing to the
Hi,
May I know whether it is fine if UA insert PAI header in the INVITE
message which it sends to a trusted network entity. I am analysing one
scenario where one of our network node gets a call from another trusted
node with From set to Anonymous and PAI header set to Calling party and
Privacy h
> We read the RFC 3966 and understood that the global number
> should be prefixed with “+” and if it is not prefixed with “+”
> then it is considered to be a local number and a phone-context
> is a MUST.
Your understanding is correct.
"As noted earlier, all phone numbers MUST use the global form
