Re: [Sip-implementors] query on presence

2015-02-20 Thread Paul Kyzivat
On 2/20/15 10:51 AM, a...@ag-projects.com wrote: On 20 Feb 2015, at 09:50, Sreejith Sadaasivan wrote: Hi All, I have a doubt on presence subscription of a buddy. 1) whether it is always mandatory to subscribe to a buddy with "SUBSCRIBE" message to retrieve the presence of a buddy? Yes

Re: [Sip-implementors] query on presence

2015-02-20 Thread ag
On 20 Feb 2015, at 09:50, Sreejith Sadaasivan wrote: > Hi All, > I have a doubt on presence subscription of a buddy. > > 1) whether it is always mandatory to subscribe to a buddy with "SUBSCRIBE" > message to retrieve the presence of a buddy? Yes > 2) is there anyway we can directly retriev

[Sip-implementors] query on presence

2015-02-20 Thread Sreejith Sadaasivan
Hi All, I have a doubt on presence subscription of a buddy. 1) whether it is always mandatory to subscribe to a buddy with "SUBSCRIBE" message to retrieve the presence of a buddy?2) is there anyway we can directly retrieve the presence of a buddy without subscribing ( without sending SUBSCRIBE

Re: [Sip-implementors] From anonymous user=phone - no response

2015-02-20 Thread Brett Tate
> An explicit passage in the RFCs is missing (or I didn't find it) > which says UAS hat to response or don't has to. RFCs typically don't go into exhaustive detail concerning the processing of malformed messages. If the UAS considers the From's URI to be malformed, they'd likely consider the 400

Re: [Sip-implementors] From anonymous user=phone - no response

2015-02-20 Thread Jörg Wedermann
Thanks a lot for your opinion Dale and Brett! In the discussions it's not easy to find a final recommended way how to behave. An explicit passage in the RFCs is missing (or I didn't find it) which says UAS hat to response or don't has to. Best Regards, Joerg -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Vo