brez writes:
> Would that depend on the policy of service provider? i.e. you don't want
> UAC who doesn't know how it wants to communicate, and by returning 488
> you get rid of any such clients requesting your service.
Strictly, it depends on the policy of the UAS. If there's a service
provid
Hi Paul,
Please see inline..
On 2/28/2015 10:58 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
On 2/28/15 3:36 PM, brez wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to establish a session (INVITE) with SDP constructed in
such a way so that neither party initiates a media session, nor
allocates resources (ports) for a non-existent
On 2/28/15 3:36 PM, brez wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to establish a session (INVITE) with SDP constructed in
such a way so that neither party initiates a media session, nor
allocates resources (ports) for a non-existent media session?
In principle you can send an initial offer with SDP that h
Hello,
Is it possible to establish a session (INVITE) with SDP constructed in
such a way so that neither party initiates a media session, nor
allocates resources (ports) for a non-existent media session?
Thanks,
Brez
___
Sip-implementors mailing l
Never mind, I should RTFM and Google:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip/current/msg26521.html
Thanks,
-- Alex
On 02/28/2015 01:29 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
Hello,
When a UAC requests to expire a contact binding from a registrar
immediately, I have seen both of these formulations:
Hello,
When a UAC requests to expire a contact binding from a registrar
immediately, I have seen both of these formulations:
REGISTER sip:domain SIP/2.0
...
To:
...
Contact: ;expires=0
and:
REGISTER sip:domain SIP/2.0
...
To:
...
Contact:
Expires: 0
Which
