Re: [Sip-implementors] offer-questions.

2015-10-19 Thread Paul Kyzivat
Trimming On 10/19/15 1:12 PM, K sipuser wrote: - INVITE with codec1,codec2,codec3 - 183 received with codec2. - Update *send* with codec4 - In early dialog state is this valid? How is this different from (2)? The only difference I see is *received* vs. *sent*. But every message received must h

Re: [Sip-implementors] offer-questions.

2015-10-19 Thread K sipuser
Thank you Paul and Vivek. Paul,in line some clarification on question 3. On Monday, October 19, 2015 7:07 AM, Paul Kyzivat wrote: I'm going to differ with Vivek to some extent. See inline below. In any case, I suggest reading RFC6337. On 10/19/15 2:21 AM, Talwar, Vivek (Nokia - IN

Re: [Sip-implementors] offer-questions.

2015-10-19 Thread Paul Kyzivat
I'm going to differ with Vivek to some extent. See inline below. In any case, I suggest reading RFC6337. On 10/19/15 2:21 AM, Talwar, Vivek (Nokia - IN/Noida) wrote: Hi Sipuser, Please find the responses as per scenario: 1. Its valid as terminating endpoint is mentioning its preferences al