Hi Basu,
Yes, PVNI header must needed to be validated by Anchoring node.
For LTE., eNode or for WIFI AP/elec must validate PVNI header if it same which
is assigned to user during boot process.
Thanks,
Amar
Sent from my iPhone
> On 10-Feb-2016, at 10:47 am, ankur bansal wrote:
>
> Hi Basu
>
Hi Alex
UA will accept it if dialog params matches and its an in dialog request
.Both UA have their own view of dialog information which should be same
ideally but its not checked if request received is from same UAS/proxy (as
per route set stored in dialog ).
Also tell me one thing when BYE rece
Hi Basu
PANI header coming from UA will be having all information in this header
from the access network where UA has latched to during bootup and got IP
connectivity .So PANI header is most specific to UA rather than any proxy
or AS.
Now whether AS should consider PANI or not depends upon if AS
And yes, I realise that from the vantage point of the BYE request, B is
the UAC and A is the UAS. That was a poor choice of labelling on my part.
On 02/09/2016 08:58 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
Hi,
1. I set up a call between two UAs through a proxy:
UAC A > Proxy P1 -> UAS B
2. P1
Hi,
1. I set up a call between two UAs through a proxy:
UAC A > Proxy P1 -> UAS B
2. P1 inserts a Record-Route header indicating that sequential requests
should be directed through it.
3. UAS B does not follow Record-Route properly and, upon hanging up,
sends a BYE directly to UA
On 2/9/16 4:52 AM, Roger Wiklund wrote:
Hi
If a request contains multiple Diversion headers, can one assume that
the topmost is used, or is this up to the application?
I'm looking for a MUST in one of the RFCs.
You won't find one.
Note that the Diversion header was an unsuccessful effort. It
Hi
This is typically dependent on the Application logic.
Excerpt from RFC 5806:
"Given a set of multiple diversions, there is a policy decision of which
Diversion header takes precedence for service logic."
Regards
Tarun Gupta
-Original Message-
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.
Hi
If a request contains multiple Diversion headers, can one assume that
the topmost is used, or is this up to the application?
I'm looking for a MUST in one of the RFCs.
Cheers
/Roger
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columb
