Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTRTION INFO

2017-01-06 Thread Paul Kyzivat
Rakesh, You don't say, at step 8, what code is the UAS using to reject the new register request? Thanks, Paul On 1/6/17 7:50 AM, Rakesh wrote: Hi Expert, My understanding is this please correct if I am wrong, Step 1) UE sent REGISTER with CSequence Number: 1804289384 and Ca

Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTRTION INFO

2017-01-06 Thread Paul Kyzivat
On 1/6/17 12:52 PM, Rakesh wrote: Hi Paul, It's 401 unauthorized error. Do you then use the challenge to generate new credentials for a retry, just as you did in the first round? Thanks, Paul On 06-Jan-2017 11:15 PM, "Paul Kyzivat" mailto:pkyzi...@alum.mit.edu>> wrote:

Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTRTION INFO

2017-01-06 Thread Rakesh
Hi Paul, It's 401 unauthorized error. On 06-Jan-2017 11:15 PM, "Paul Kyzivat" wrote: Rakesh, You don't say, at step 8, what code is the UAS using to reject the new register request? Thanks, Paul On 1/6/17 7:50 AM, Rakesh wrote: > Hi Expert, > > My understanding is this ple

Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTRTION INFO

2017-01-06 Thread Paul Kyzivat
Rakesh, You don't say, at step 8, what code is the UAS using to reject the new register request? Thanks, Paul On 1/6/17 7:50 AM, Rakesh wrote: Hi Expert, My understanding is this please correct if I am wrong, Step 1) UE sent REGISTER with CSequence Number: 1804289384 and Ca

Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTRTION INFO

2017-01-06 Thread Rakesh
HI Brett, Thanks for the response .. Have a nice day .. *Best Regards* *Rakesh Kumar Mohanty* On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 8:44 PM, Brett Tate wrote: > As mentioned based upon what you provided, the server returning 401 is > okay. The client just goes through the normal authentication process by

Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTRTION INFO

2017-01-06 Thread Brett Tate
> In our case the Call-ID: ee74e9624ebe1844 value us > differ from the previous one so the UAS should update > the binding and accept the REGISTER request instead > rejecting it with 401. 401 is associated with authentication. They have the right to generate 401 if they want. For instance, they

Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTRTION INFO

2017-01-06 Thread Rakesh
Hi Expert, My understanding is this please correct if I am wrong, Step 1) UE sent REGISTER with CSequence Number: 1804289384 and Call-ID: 28335007c4047a42 Step 2) 401 with CSequence Number: 1804289384 and Call-ID: 28335007c4047a42 Step 3) After challenge UE sent the REGISTER with CSequence Numb

Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTRTION INFO

2017-01-06 Thread Mohit Soni
Hi Rakesh, Full trace of your scenario or at least the message body of the fresh REGISTER message sent from UE with new Call-ID may help figure out things. Regards, Mohit Soni On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Rakesh wrote: > Hi Expert, > > I need one info for the following below SIP REGISTER s

[Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTRTION INFO

2017-01-06 Thread Rakesh
Hi Expert, I need one info for the following below SIP REGISTER scenario. Step 1) UE sent REGISTER with CSeq =1 CallID=11 Step 2) 401 with CSeq =1 CallID=11 Step 3) After challenge UE sent the REGISTER with CSeq =2 CallID=11 Step 4 ) 200OK with same CSeq =2 CallID=11 which is expe