Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on SIP REGISTER refresh dialog

2017-03-10 Thread Paul Kyzivat
On 3/10/17 2:49 PM, Dale R. Worley wrote: Puneet Kumar writes: If a UA uses different dialog-ID(say new Call-ID & No To header tag) for REGISTER refresh with same contact address then it is allowed? If not then please point out RFC section which blocks a UA from doing

Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on SIP REGISTER refresh dialog

2017-03-10 Thread Dale R. Worley
Puneet Kumar writes: > If a UA uses different dialog-ID(say new Call-ID & No To header tag) > for REGISTER refresh with same contact address then it is allowed? > If not then please point out RFC section which blocks a UA from doing it. > > In general does REGISTER refresh

Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on SIP REGISTER refresh dialog

2017-03-10 Thread Brett Tate
Hi, Sorry about the resend; however I wanted to mention that you also might want to look at RFC 5626 (and RFC 5627) since it updates RFC 3261. > -Original Message- > From: Brett Tate [mailto:br...@broadsoft.com] > Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 6:35 AM > To: 'Puneet Kumar';

Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on SIP REGISTER refresh dialog

2017-03-10 Thread Brett Tate
> If a UA uses different dialog-ID (say new Call-ID & No To > header tag) for REGISTER refresh with same contact > address then it is allowed? Yes; however you should read RFC 3261 section 10. For instance, section 10.2.4 indicates "UA SHOULD use the same Call-ID for all registrations during a

[Sip-implementors] Query on SIP REGISTER refresh dialog

2017-03-10 Thread Puneet Kumar
Hi All, I have a generic doubt on SIP registration request. If a UA uses different dialog-ID(say new Call-ID & No To header tag) for REGISTER refresh with same contact address then it is allowed? If not then please point out RFC section which blocks a UA from doing it. In general does REGISTER