Re: [Sip-implementors] Handling of message cross over between 200OK(INVITE) and 200OK(PRACK)

2017-05-25 Thread Dale R. Worley
Dinoop writes: > How can a B2BUA handle message crossing of 200OK(invite) over 200OK(PRACK)? > Is it a correct approach for the implementation to reject the > 200OK(INVITE) until it receives PRACK response? > > I have gone through the RFC 6337, unfortunately nothing is mentioned about > this scen

[Sip-implementors] answer RTP/AVPF to offer RTP/AVP

2017-05-25 Thread Brett Tate
Hi, Concerning the offer/answer model, is it valid to have answer SDP containing "m=" line with "RTP/AVPF" when the offer SDP "m=" line contained "RTP/AVP"? I didn't notice it being restricted by RFC 3264. RFC 4585 discusses offer/answer and mixed mode. However, I didn't notice the validity of