Re: [Sip-implementors] Sending deRegister request just after sending REGISTER request

2017-06-27 Thread Parveen Aggarwal
Thanks Srinivas for reply. Is there any specification which restricts to send REGISTER with expires=0 before receiving final response of REGISTER with expires>0? Also, what if first REGISTER(With Expires>0) reaches to the network and after that DUT sending REGISTER with expires=0? Regards,

Re: [Sip-implementors] Sending deRegister request just after sending REGISTER request

2017-06-27 Thread Banda, Srinivas (Srinivas)
What if the Previous REGISTER(expires > 0) lost in the network, and the REGISTER with expires = 0 might reach the REGISTRAR first in this case REGISTRAR will not find the active registration, so end up with 4xx response. Regards Srinivas -Original Message- From:

[Sip-implementors] Sending deRegister request just after sending REGISTER request

2017-06-27 Thread Parveen Aggarwal
Dear Expert, Is it valid to send deRegister request i.e. REGISTER with expires=0 before receiving final response for previous registration request i.e. REGISTER with expires >0 ? As per RFC 3261, It is mentioned for new REGISTER request only UAs MUST NOT send a new registration (that is,