Re: [Sip-implementors] Sending deRegister request just after sending REGISTER request

2017-06-28 Thread Dale R. Worley
Paul Kyzivat writes: > Another consideration is whether these are done using the same Call-ID. > (In the same pseudo-dialog.) I don't think it will generally make any > difference, but it may present issues if you are also requesting a > temporary gruu with the

Re: [Sip-implementors] Sending deRegister request just after sending REGISTER request

2017-06-28 Thread Paul Kyzivat
On 6/28/17 1:11 AM, Parveen Aggarwal wrote: Dear Expert, Is it valid to send deRegister request i.e. REGISTER with expires=0 before receiving final response for previous registration request i.e. REGISTER with expires >0 ? As per RFC 3261, It is mentioned for new REGISTER request only UAs

Re: [Sip-implementors] Sending deRegister request just after sending REGISTER request

2017-06-28 Thread Banda, Srinivas (Srinivas)
Hi Praveen, I didn’t remember exact specification, But it will be always better to send DE-REGISTER once the REGISTER message response is received. Regards Srinivas From: Parveen Aggarwal [mailto:parveenakara...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 11:15 AM To: Banda, Srinivas (Srinivas)