Re: [Sip-implementors] rules for From-tag generation in forking B2BUA

2017-10-04 Thread Dale R. Worley
Andrew Pogrebennyk writes: > I understand that there is no normative document for a B2BUA but in > general as common sense dictates should the B2BUAs that generate > multiple outgoing requests on their UAC side for a single incoming > request due to parallel forking

Re: [Sip-implementors] rules for From-tag generation in forking B2BUA

2017-10-04 Thread M. Ranganathan
B2BUAs would generally create a single outbound dialog for each arm of the fork - hence are under no obligation to re-use the incoming From tag. Indeed, I would suspect the most usual (best?) practice would be to have distinct From tags for each leg of the outbound Fork. On the other hand a

Re: [Sip-implementors] rules for From-tag generation in forking B2BUA

2017-10-04 Thread Paul Kyzivat
On 10/4/17 4:20 PM, Andrew Pogrebennyk wrote: Hi, I understand that there is no normative document for a B2BUA but in general as common sense dictates should the B2BUAs that generate multiple outgoing requests on their UAC side for a single incoming request due to parallel forking create unique

[Sip-implementors] rules for From-tag generation in forking B2BUA

2017-10-04 Thread Andrew Pogrebennyk
Hi, I understand that there is no normative document for a B2BUA but in general as common sense dictates should the B2BUAs that generate multiple outgoing requests on their UAC side for a single incoming request due to parallel forking create unique From-tags or reuse the same From tag in every