Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP with wrong payload

2018-11-14 Thread Sundbaum Per-Johan (Telenor Sverige AB)
Thank you very much Alex, Dale and Paul ! BR/pj -Original Message- From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov Sent: den 15 november 2018 07:20 To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject:

Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP with wrong payload

2018-11-14 Thread Alex Balashov
Correct -- if the party receiving the G.722 packets did not advertise support for the G.722 payload type in its SDP stanza, it should just ignore them if they arrive anyway. On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 06:21:14AM +, Sundbaum Per-Johan (Telenor Sverige AB) wrote: > I should have given more detail

Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP with wrong payload

2018-11-14 Thread Sundbaum Per-Johan (Telenor Sverige AB)
I should have given more details, in the example I gave there was actual a couple of G.722 packets that was marked with payload type G.722 received in a session where G.711A(PCMA/8000) was established as the agreed codec, the receiving PBX did not have support for G.722. As I interpret RFC 355

Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP with wrong payload

2018-11-14 Thread Dale R. Worley
Paul Heitkemper writes: > RFC 3550 Section 5.1 > > " A receiver MUST ignore packets with payload types that it does not > understand." Though this rule is based on the payload type code, and not the encoding. The original post says only that the packets contain G.722 data, but if that data is

Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP with wrong payload

2018-11-14 Thread Sundbaum Per-Johan (Telenor Sverige AB)
Thank you very much Paul ! BR/pj -Original Message- From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Paul Heitkemper Sent: den 14 november 2018 16:35 To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [Sip-impl

Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP with wrong payload

2018-11-14 Thread Paul Heitkemper
RFC 3550 Section 5.1 " A receiver MUST ignore packets with payload types that it does not understand." -- Paul On 2018-11-14 01:30, Sundbaum Per-Johan (Telenor Sverige AB) wrote: > Thanks ! > Ok, but to be more specific, are there any general recommendations on > question like: Should