sure if any UE microphone get
activated during 18x.
I believe this is unrealistic ask. Please suggest.
Regards,
Ambrish
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Paul Kyzivat
wrote:
> On 5/29/15 12:11 PM, Ambrish Kumar wrote:
>
>> Dear Team,
>>
>> I am working on Lawful inte
Dear Team,
I am working on Lawful interception and integrating our IMS nodes (SBC)
with LEA. We have got a very unusual ask form IB/RAW where they want to
listen the RTP flow before call is actually answered by “B”
We need your help and confirmation from any RFC which clarifies when does
Media
Thanks Paul and Brett for prompt response.
Regards,
Ambrish
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 11:41 PM, Paul Kyzivat
wrote:
> On 11/20/14 1:38 AM, Ambrish Kumar wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>> We read the RFC 3966 and understood that the global number should be
>>
Hi All,
We read the RFC 3966 and understood that the global number should be
prefixed with “+” and if it is not prefixed with “+” then it is considered
to be a local number and a phone-context is a MUST.
But the section 7.4 is a bit confusing to the ABNF syntax of global number.
Does it mean
Hi,
I am implementing Privacy service (Line service), and I have certain query
regaridng *anonymization* of History-header info.
As per RFC 4244bis, privacy service can set History info as "anonymous".
1) Its not clear from RFC, when multiple History info headers are received
in the request wit
Hi,
Question :-
Can IMS-App. server (MMTEL Application Server) modify the PAI header
received in the 200 OK of INVITE from B party.
I need to implement Calling line presentation for caller as instructed by
legacy system (IIN Application server).
In my case IIN app. server is instructing MMTE
